Based on the two texts, it can be inferred that "spend nothing" exchange groups have a generally positive impact on the community, despite some concerns about safety and competition with local second-hand stores. Text 1 highlights the benefits of these groups, such as convenience and reduced costs for community members, while also acknowledging the risks, including potential safety issues and the effect on traditional businesses. Conversely, Text 2 emphasizes the positive outcomes, pointing out a decrease in emergency financial assistance requests thanks to these groups and the rules in place to protect participants. Together, the texts suggest that while there are some risks and challenges, the overall influence of "spend nothing" groups enriches local communities and facilitates resource sharing among members.
Use the two texts to answer the question below.
Text 1: Online spaces that allow people local communities to gift unneeded items to one another or growing in popularity but how do they impact our communities? Supporters of these groups explain that the lack of middleman in this type of giving helps cut down on monetary and time cost for everyone. With just a few clicks and a quick handoff, community members can find what they need or get rid of what they don't need all for free. Critics of these systems explain that this kind of convenience comes with risk. One risk is personal safety as participants might share their home addresses with strangers in order to exchange items. Additionally the owner of a second-hand store pointed out that the rise of these groups has heard their businesses and could eventually constrain their ability to serve community members who are not comfortable or knowledgeable about online groups. Regardless of the mixed impact these groups have arrived and continued to grow and use and popularity Nationwide.
Text 2: Online "spend nothing" exchange groups are a worthy addition to the community effort to cut waste and improve quality of life. Data from a recent study in the area shows a significant decrease in the number of emergency financial assistance request to local charity since the groups were created. Although critics have concerns about safety of participants the harm they fear is only hypothetical there have yet to be any actual problematic incidents linked to this group most groups even have rules designated to protect their members others have suggested these groups will harm local second hand stores but many of the participants are guided to such stores by group members when they post searching for items no one has on hand to gift one might even argue that these groups help second hand stores by spreading the word about the locations and the types of things they are likely to sell overall this trend and rich is the local community and helps get things that might otherwise be destined for the dump into the hands of people who can give them New Life. Use the two texts to answer the question. In 3 to 5 sentences making an inference based on the two taxes what can you infer about "spend nothing" groups and their impact on the community? Explain how the two articles work together to support your inference include evidence from the Texts
1 answer