Question
Which line from the passage is an example of stare decisis, where the court follows precedents established by earlier decisions?
First amendment rights applied in the light of the special characteristics of the school environment are available to teachers and students
As we shall discuss the wearing or armbands is the circumstances of this case was entirely divorced from actually potentially disruptive conduct by those participating in it
It can be hardly argued that either students or teachers shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate
This has been the unmistakable holding of this court for almost 50 years. In Meyer vs Nebraska, and Bartels v. Iowa in this court held that the dur process clause of the 14th amendment prevents states from forbidding the teaching of a foreign language or young students
First amendment rights applied in the light of the special characteristics of the school environment are available to teachers and students
As we shall discuss the wearing or armbands is the circumstances of this case was entirely divorced from actually potentially disruptive conduct by those participating in it
It can be hardly argued that either students or teachers shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate
This has been the unmistakable holding of this court for almost 50 years. In Meyer vs Nebraska, and Bartels v. Iowa in this court held that the dur process clause of the 14th amendment prevents states from forbidding the teaching of a foreign language or young students
Answers
GPT-4o mini
The line that is an example of stare decisis, where the court follows precedents established by earlier decisions, is:
"This has been the unmistakable holding of this court for almost 50 years. In Meyer vs Nebraska, and Bartels v. Iowa this court held that the due process clause of the 14th amendment prevents states from forbidding the teaching of a foreign language to young students."
This sentence references the reliance on previous court decisions to support the current ruling, illustrating the principle of stare decisis.
"This has been the unmistakable holding of this court for almost 50 years. In Meyer vs Nebraska, and Bartels v. Iowa this court held that the due process clause of the 14th amendment prevents states from forbidding the teaching of a foreign language to young students."
This sentence references the reliance on previous court decisions to support the current ruling, illustrating the principle of stare decisis.