Question

Re word this "I find the first argument more compelling, as it supports the safety and benefits of genetically engineered organisms like AquAdvantage Atlantic salmon, highlighting the precision of genetic engineering compared to traditional breeding methods that alter multiple genes without clear understanding. The author points out that the salmon has just one extra copy of a fish gene, designed specifically to enhance growth without altering its physiology, thus improving food production efficiency without compromising human health. It also notes that the fish hormones involved have no effect on consumers, challenging common fears about genetically modified organisms. Conversely, the opposing argument characterizes the AquAdvantage salmon as a "Frankenfish," driven by corporate profit motives with insufficient regard for health and environmental impacts. While I understand these concerns, I believe the FDA-verified safety and minimal risk of the modifications in the AquAdvantage salmon support the potential for responsible advancements in food technology to meet growing demands safely."

Answer 1

I find the first argument more persuasive because it emphasizes the safety and advantages of genetically engineered organisms like AquAdvantage Atlantic salmon. It underscores the precision of genetic engineering in contrast to traditional breeding methods, which can unintentionally alter numerous genes without a clear understanding of the consequences. The author highlights that this salmon has been modified with just one additional copy of a specific fish gene aimed at enhancing growth while preserving its natural physiology, thereby increasing food production efficiency without jeopardizing human health. Furthermore, it mentions that the fish hormones involved do not affect consumers, addressing common apprehensions surrounding genetically modified organisms. In contrast, the opposing viewpoint labels the AquAdvantage salmon as a "Frankenfish," suggesting it is primarily motivated by corporate profit with inadequate consideration of health and environmental implications. While I acknowledge these concerns, I believe that the FDA's verification of the safety and minimal risk associated with the modifications in AquAdvantage salmon supports the idea that responsible advancements in food technology can meet rising demands in a safe manner.