False. While primary sources are valuable because they provide firsthand accounts or evidence from the time period being studied, they are not always credible. Authors of primary sources may have biases, limited perspectives, or personal agendas that can affect the reliability of the information. Therefore, it's essential to critically analyze and contextualize primary sources rather than accepting them as fully credible without scrutiny.
All primary sources are credible bc they were written by ppl who were alive at the time
True
False
1 answer
1 answer