An earthquake occurs at a convergent boundary. The earthquake has a high magnitude, and an observer reports the earthquake having low intensity. Which statement about the earthquake is correct?(1 point) Responses The earthquake was caused by plates moving together. It did not release much energy, but the observer saw a lot of damage. The earthquake was caused by plates moving together. It did not release much energy, but the observer saw a lot of damage. The earthquake was caused by plates moving apart. It released a lot of energy, but the observer did not see much damage. The earthquake was caused by plates moving apart. It released a lot of energy, but the observer did not see much damage. The earthquake was caused by plates moving together. It released a lot of energy, but the observer did not see much damage. The earthquake was caused by plates moving together. It released a lot of energy, but the observer did not see much damage. The earthquake was caused by plates moving apart. It did not release much energy, but the observer saw a lot of damage.

asked by drakeboing

3 months ago

10 views

0

0

1 answer

The correct statement about the earthquake is:

"The earthquake was caused by plates moving together. It released a lot of energy, but the observer did not see much damage."

In this context, a high magnitude indicates that the earthquake released a significant amount of energy. However, the low intensity as reported by the observer suggests that there was not much damage observed, possibly due to the location of the observer or the depth of the earthquake. Earthquakes at convergent boundaries are typically associated with high magnitude.

answered by GPT-4o mini

0

0

Question

An earthquake occurs at a convergent boundary. The earthquake has a high magnitude, and an observer reports the earthquake having low intensity. Which statement about the earthquake is correct?(1 point) Responses The earthquake was caused by plates moving together. It did not release much energy, but the observer saw a lot of damage. The earthquake was caused by plates moving together. It did not release much energy, but the observer saw a lot of damage. The earthquake was caused by plates moving apart. It released a lot of energy, but the observer did not see much damage. The earthquake was caused by plates moving apart. It released a lot of energy, but the observer did not see much damage. The earthquake was caused by plates moving together. It released a lot of energy, but the observer did not see much damage. The earthquake was caused by plates moving together. It released a lot of energy, but the observer did not see much damage. The earthquake was caused by plates moving apart. It did not release much energy, but the observer saw a lot of damage.

1 answer

The correct statement about the earthquake is:

"The earthquake was caused by plates moving together. It released a lot of energy, but the observer did not see much damage."

In this context, a high magnitude indicates that the earthquake released a significant amount of energy. However, the low intensity as reported by the observer suggests that there was not much damage observed, possibly due to the location of the observer or the depth of the earthquake. Earthquakes at convergent boundaries are typically associated with high magnitude.

GPT-4o mini · Answer

The correct statement about the earthquake is:

"The earthquake was caused by plates moving together. It released a lot of energy, but the observer did not see much damage."

In this context, a high magnitude indicates that the earthquake released a significant amount of energy. However, the low intensity as reported by the observer suggests that there was not much damage observed, possibly due to the location of the observer or the depth of the earthquake. Earthquakes at convergent boundaries are typically associated with high magnitude.