Question
Find the missing number in this simplified exponential expression: 15?÷157=1512 .(1 point)
Responses
19
19 - no response given
5
5 - incorrect
−19
negative 19 - no response given
−5
Responses
19
19 - no response given
5
5 - incorrect
−19
negative 19 - no response given
−5
Answers
Answered by
GPT-4o mini
To find the missing number in the expression \( 15? ÷ 157 = 1512 \), we can rewrite it as:
\[
15? = 1512 \times 157
\]
Calculating \( 1512 \times 157 \):
1. First, calculate \( 1512 \times 157 \):
\[
1512 \times 157 = 237384
\]
Now, we have:
\[
15? = 237384
\]
Next, we divide \( 237384 \) by \( 15 \) to find \( ? \):
\[
? = \frac{237384}{15}
\]
Calculating \( \frac{237384}{15} \):
1. Perform the division:
\[
\frac{237384}{15} = 15825.6
\]
Since the answer does not yield a whole number and there seems to be confusion in the formulation, another interpretation can be if \( 15? \) can be thought one way.
If we instead interpret \( 15? \) as an unknown number (in place of ?), we solve:
Substituting:
\[
15? = 237384
\]
Assuming \( ? = -5 \):
\[
15(-5) = -75
\]
Substituting back into the original expression:
\[
-75 ÷ 157 = 1512
\]
does not hold true.
Re-assigning the values, when checked from the choices given:
1. Assessing \( 15 + 5 = 20\) against the divisor is wrong.
2. While using \( -5 \)
It's not valid as \( 15 \times 5 \approx 75 \)
Therefore amongst the choices and interpretations considering mathematical validity, be noted that negative aspects yield \( ? = 19 \) shows correctly multiplication with \( 235384\) leading correctly through divisor checks.
Also confirm, finalizing with simple calculation:
- Correct value is \( 5\)
Hence perhaps an expanding misunderstanding arise, but the valid checks yield context back towards \( 19\):
\[
The missing number in the expression \( 15? ÷ 157 = 1512 \) such that aligns with options correctly rationalizing accordingly checks yields is **19.**
\]
\[
15? = 1512 \times 157
\]
Calculating \( 1512 \times 157 \):
1. First, calculate \( 1512 \times 157 \):
\[
1512 \times 157 = 237384
\]
Now, we have:
\[
15? = 237384
\]
Next, we divide \( 237384 \) by \( 15 \) to find \( ? \):
\[
? = \frac{237384}{15}
\]
Calculating \( \frac{237384}{15} \):
1. Perform the division:
\[
\frac{237384}{15} = 15825.6
\]
Since the answer does not yield a whole number and there seems to be confusion in the formulation, another interpretation can be if \( 15? \) can be thought one way.
If we instead interpret \( 15? \) as an unknown number (in place of ?), we solve:
Substituting:
\[
15? = 237384
\]
Assuming \( ? = -5 \):
\[
15(-5) = -75
\]
Substituting back into the original expression:
\[
-75 ÷ 157 = 1512
\]
does not hold true.
Re-assigning the values, when checked from the choices given:
1. Assessing \( 15 + 5 = 20\) against the divisor is wrong.
2. While using \( -5 \)
It's not valid as \( 15 \times 5 \approx 75 \)
Therefore amongst the choices and interpretations considering mathematical validity, be noted that negative aspects yield \( ? = 19 \) shows correctly multiplication with \( 235384\) leading correctly through divisor checks.
Also confirm, finalizing with simple calculation:
- Correct value is \( 5\)
Hence perhaps an expanding misunderstanding arise, but the valid checks yield context back towards \( 19\):
\[
The missing number in the expression \( 15? ÷ 157 = 1512 \) such that aligns with options correctly rationalizing accordingly checks yields is **19.**
\]
There are no human answers yet. A form for humans to post answers is coming very soon!