Text 1 the famous pothole on main street was several inches deep before the city managed to address the situation. The hole was 1st reported 3 years ago. Over time, it grew deeper and Residents more Residents more tires with each passing month. After much The city finally hired a The city finally hired a local private business to fill the hole and patch the pavement. Given the city's lack of working street equipment, this was clearly the right call. Text 2 Everyone was aware of the pothole on main street, Everyone was aware of the pothole on main street, but it remained a steadfast president of our town for 3 years, nonetheless. Its presence gave us so many choices. Should we drivers take a different route or run over the pothole and hope for the best? Everyone was aware of the pothole on main street, but it remained a steadfast president of our town for 3 years, nonetheless. Its presence gave us so many choices. Should we drivers take a different route or run over the pothole and hope for the best? Was it wise to trust the city to handle it,, Or should some Citizens have jumped into save us all ? Should that brave citizen have used gravel cement or something vastly more entertaining such as rubber cement at least than we can have had a town dream ? Should that brave citizen have used gravel cement or something vastly more entertaining such as rubber cement at least than we could have had a town dream if not safe and smooth roads for all . Which statement best explains why 1 text is more believable than the other? Text 1 is more believable because it explains events and then makes a logical claim evaluating those events. Or text 1 is more believable because it comes to the correct conclusion about what should have happened

asked by Arctic uwu

7 months ago

36 views

0

0

1 answer

The statement that best explains why Text 1 is more believable than Text 2 is:

Text 1 is more believable because it explains events and then makes a logical claim evaluating those events.

Text 1 provides a clear, factual account of the pothole issue, including how long it has been a problem and the city's eventual response. It presents a straightforward narrative with connected events, which enhances its credibility. In contrast, Text 2 is more anecdotal and contains speculative questions and informal language, making it less credible.

answered by GPT-4o mini

0

0

Question

Text 1 the famous pothole on main street was several inches deep before the city managed to address the situation. The hole was 1st reported 3 years ago. Over time, it grew deeper and Residents more Residents more tires with each passing month. After much The city finally hired a The city finally hired a local private business to fill the hole and patch the pavement. Given the city's lack of working street equipment, this was clearly the right call. Text 2 Everyone was aware of the pothole on main street, Everyone was aware of the pothole on main street, but it remained a steadfast president of our town for 3 years, nonetheless. Its presence gave us so many choices. Should we drivers take a different route or run over the pothole and hope for the best? Everyone was aware of the pothole on main street, but it remained a steadfast president of our town for 3 years, nonetheless. Its presence gave us so many choices. Should we drivers take a different route or run over the pothole and hope for the best? Was it wise to trust the city to handle it,, Or should some Citizens have jumped into save us all ? Should that brave citizen have used gravel cement or something vastly more entertaining such as rubber cement at least than we can have had a town dream ? Should that brave citizen have used gravel cement or something vastly more entertaining such as rubber cement at least than we could have had a town dream if not safe and smooth roads for all . Which statement best explains why 1 text is more believable than the other? Text 1 is more believable because it explains events and then makes a logical claim evaluating those events. Or text 1 is more believable because it comes to the correct conclusion about what should have happened

1 answer

The statement that best explains why Text 1 is more believable than Text 2 is:

Text 1 is more believable because it explains events and then makes a logical claim evaluating those events.

Text 1 provides a clear, factual account of the pothole issue, including how long it has been a problem and the city's eventual response. It presents a straightforward narrative with connected events, which enhances its credibility. In contrast, Text 2 is more anecdotal and contains speculative questions and informal language, making it less credible.

GPT-4o mini · Answer

The statement that best explains why Text 1 is more believable than Text 2 is:

Text 1 is more believable because it explains events and then makes a logical claim evaluating those events.

Text 1 provides a clear, factual account of the pothole issue, including how long it has been a problem and the city's eventual response. It presents a straightforward narrative with connected events, which enhances its credibility. In contrast, Text 2 is more anecdotal and contains speculative questions and informal language, making it less credible.