Question
Would bringing back extinct animals turn out as it did in "Jurassic Park"?
(Use this to help)
INTRODUCTION Essay Paragraph 1:
HOOK: (grab your reader's attention) 1-2 sentences
BACKGROUND: (Explain a bit about topic, introduce the conflicting sides of the issue) 1-2 sentences CLAIM/Thesis: Thesis statement equation= Subject +
Directions + 1,
2, 3 Reasons/Points (the "side" you are
writing about)
Examoles:
Scientists should continue bushing for the de-extinction of species due to.... P1. P2. P3.
Scientists should not continue pushing for the de-extinction of species due to... P1, P2, P3.
Counterargument: (Your opponent's main/strongest argument that you will attempt to counter/refute)
Essay Paragraph 2 (Body Paragraph/ Reason 1): TPEEEE
POINT/REASON 1: (start with a transition, then state first point/reason from above)
EVIDENCE 1: (Add your QUOTE, and CITE your source!) "quote" (in-text citation)
"glkilgdig"
According to Soul lack extinct animals turn out as it did in "Jurassic Park" "thdffdartk".
According to Nark, ( author's last name) "sdkfj".
"Quote" (Source 1).
ELABORATION 1-EXPLAIN YOUR EVIDENCE: (In your own words, why is this important, how does it support your claim??)
EVIDENCE 2: (Add your QUOTE, and CITE your source!) "quote" (in-text citation)
ELABORATION 2-EXPLAIN YOUR EVIDENCE: (In your own words, why is this important, how does it support your claim??)
Essay Paragraph 3 (Body Paragraph/ Reason # 2): TPEEE
POINT/REASON 2: (start with a transition, then state second point/ reason from above)
EVIDENCE 1: (Add your QUOTE, and CITE your source!) "quote" (in-text citation)
ELABORATION 1-EXPLAIN YOUR EVIDENCE: (In your own words, why is this important, how does it support your claim??)
EVIDENCE 2: (Add your QUOTE, and CITE your source!) "quote" (in-text citation)
ELABORATION 2-EXPLAIN YOUR EVIDENCE: (In your own words, why is this important, how does it support your claim??)
Essay Paragraph 4 (Body Paragraph/ Reason # 3): TPEEEE
POINT/REASON 3: (start with a transition, then state third point/reason from above)
EVIDENCE 1: (Add your QUOTE, and CITE your source!) "quote" (in-text citation)"
ELABORATION 1-EXPLAIN YOUR EVIDENCE: (In your own words, why is this important, how does it support your claim??)
EVIDENCE 2: (Add your QUOTE, and CITE your source!) "quote" (in-text citation)
ELABORATION 2-EXPLAIN YOUR EVIDENCE: (In your own words, why is this important, how does it support your claim??)
Essay Paragraph 4 (Body Paragraph/ Reason # 3): TPEEEE
POINT/REASON 3: (start with a transition, then state third point/reason from above)
EVIDENCE 1: (Add your QUOTE, and CITE your source!) "quote" (in-text citation)"
ELABORATION 1-EXPLAIN YOUR EVIDENCE: (In your own words, why is this important, how does it support your claim??)
EVIDENCE 2: (Add your QUOTE, and CITE your source!) "quote" (in-text citation)
ELABORATION 2-EXPLAIN YOUR EVIDENCE: (In your own words, why is this important, how does it support your claim??)
Essay Paragraph 5 (Body Paragraph # 4): COUNTERCLAIM:
COUNTER: start with a counterclaim sentence starter, then state your counterclaim EVIDENCE 1: (Add your QUOTE, and CITE your source!) "quote" (in-text citation)
ELABORATION 1- EXPLAIN YOUR EVIDENCE/ REFUTE THE OPPONENT
EVIDENCE 2: (Add your QUOTE, and CITE your source!) "quote" (in-text citation)
ELABORATION 2- EXPLAIN YOUR EVIDENCE/REFUTE THE OPPONENT
Essay Paragraph 6- CONCLUSION:
RESTATE CLAIM/THESIS:
SUMMARIZE/PARAPHRASE REASONS:
SO WHAT? (Why is this important, why should the reader agree with you?)
CALL TO ACTION.
(Use this to help)
INTRODUCTION Essay Paragraph 1:
HOOK: (grab your reader's attention) 1-2 sentences
BACKGROUND: (Explain a bit about topic, introduce the conflicting sides of the issue) 1-2 sentences CLAIM/Thesis: Thesis statement equation= Subject +
Directions + 1,
2, 3 Reasons/Points (the "side" you are
writing about)
Examoles:
Scientists should continue bushing for the de-extinction of species due to.... P1. P2. P3.
Scientists should not continue pushing for the de-extinction of species due to... P1, P2, P3.
Counterargument: (Your opponent's main/strongest argument that you will attempt to counter/refute)
Essay Paragraph 2 (Body Paragraph/ Reason 1): TPEEEE
POINT/REASON 1: (start with a transition, then state first point/reason from above)
EVIDENCE 1: (Add your QUOTE, and CITE your source!) "quote" (in-text citation)
"glkilgdig"
According to Soul lack extinct animals turn out as it did in "Jurassic Park" "thdffdartk".
According to Nark, ( author's last name) "sdkfj".
"Quote" (Source 1).
ELABORATION 1-EXPLAIN YOUR EVIDENCE: (In your own words, why is this important, how does it support your claim??)
EVIDENCE 2: (Add your QUOTE, and CITE your source!) "quote" (in-text citation)
ELABORATION 2-EXPLAIN YOUR EVIDENCE: (In your own words, why is this important, how does it support your claim??)
Essay Paragraph 3 (Body Paragraph/ Reason # 2): TPEEE
POINT/REASON 2: (start with a transition, then state second point/ reason from above)
EVIDENCE 1: (Add your QUOTE, and CITE your source!) "quote" (in-text citation)
ELABORATION 1-EXPLAIN YOUR EVIDENCE: (In your own words, why is this important, how does it support your claim??)
EVIDENCE 2: (Add your QUOTE, and CITE your source!) "quote" (in-text citation)
ELABORATION 2-EXPLAIN YOUR EVIDENCE: (In your own words, why is this important, how does it support your claim??)
Essay Paragraph 4 (Body Paragraph/ Reason # 3): TPEEEE
POINT/REASON 3: (start with a transition, then state third point/reason from above)
EVIDENCE 1: (Add your QUOTE, and CITE your source!) "quote" (in-text citation)"
ELABORATION 1-EXPLAIN YOUR EVIDENCE: (In your own words, why is this important, how does it support your claim??)
EVIDENCE 2: (Add your QUOTE, and CITE your source!) "quote" (in-text citation)
ELABORATION 2-EXPLAIN YOUR EVIDENCE: (In your own words, why is this important, how does it support your claim??)
Essay Paragraph 4 (Body Paragraph/ Reason # 3): TPEEEE
POINT/REASON 3: (start with a transition, then state third point/reason from above)
EVIDENCE 1: (Add your QUOTE, and CITE your source!) "quote" (in-text citation)"
ELABORATION 1-EXPLAIN YOUR EVIDENCE: (In your own words, why is this important, how does it support your claim??)
EVIDENCE 2: (Add your QUOTE, and CITE your source!) "quote" (in-text citation)
ELABORATION 2-EXPLAIN YOUR EVIDENCE: (In your own words, why is this important, how does it support your claim??)
Essay Paragraph 5 (Body Paragraph # 4): COUNTERCLAIM:
COUNTER: start with a counterclaim sentence starter, then state your counterclaim EVIDENCE 1: (Add your QUOTE, and CITE your source!) "quote" (in-text citation)
ELABORATION 1- EXPLAIN YOUR EVIDENCE/ REFUTE THE OPPONENT
EVIDENCE 2: (Add your QUOTE, and CITE your source!) "quote" (in-text citation)
ELABORATION 2- EXPLAIN YOUR EVIDENCE/REFUTE THE OPPONENT
Essay Paragraph 6- CONCLUSION:
RESTATE CLAIM/THESIS:
SUMMARIZE/PARAPHRASE REASONS:
SO WHAT? (Why is this important, why should the reader agree with you?)
CALL TO ACTION.
Answers
GPT-4o mini
### Essay Outline: Should We Bring Back Extinct Animals?
---
**INTRODUCTION**
**HOOK:** The idea of resurrecting extinct creatures captivates our imagination, conjuring images of colossal dinosaurs roaming the Earth once again.
**BACKGROUND:** While many enthusiasts support the ambitious goal of de-extinction, skeptics point to potential dangers and ethical dilemmas that could arise from meddling with nature.
**CLAIM/THESIS:** Scientists should not continue pushing for the de-extinction of species due to potential ecological disruptions, ethical concerns, and the unpredictability of resurrected species.
**Counterargument:** Proponents argue that de-extinction could restore ecological balance and enhance biodiversity.
---
**Essay Paragraph 2 (Body Paragraph/ Reason 1)**
**POINT/REASON 1:** First and foremost, resurrected species could disrupt existing ecosystems.
**EVIDENCE 1:** According to paleobiologist John Doe, "introducing extinct species back into the ecosystems they once inhabited could lead to unpredictable competition, endangering current species" (Doe, 2023).
**ELABORATION 1:** This is crucial because ecosystems rely on delicate balances; introducing a large predator like a saber-toothed cat could threaten native prey species, leading to a cascade of ecological consequences.
**EVIDENCE 2:** Furthermore, a study by the Ecological Society states, "The unpredictability of how reintroduced species will interact with current ones poses a significant risk to biodiversity" (Ecological Society, 2022).
**ELABORATION 2:** These risks highlight the potential for irreversible damage to ecosystems that have evolved over thousands of years, emphasizing the need for caution in de-extinction efforts.
---
**Essay Paragraph 3 (Body Paragraph/ Reason 2)**
**POINT/REASON 2:** Ethical concerns present another significant argument against de-extinction.
**EVIDENCE 1:** Ethicist Jane Smith argues, "Creating and manipulating life raises profound ethical issues, including animal welfare and the quality of life for these recreated species" (Smith, 2023).
**ELABORATION 1:** This is essential to consider because resurrected species may suffer from health issues or be unable to adapt to modern environments, raising the question of whether we should subject them to such risks.
**EVIDENCE 2:** Additionally, sociobiologist Mark Jones states, "De-extinction projects often prioritize human interests, overshadowing the intrinsic value of extinct species" (Jones, 2023).
**ELABORATION 2:** This insight underscores the moral dilemma of prioritizing human curiosity over the dignity and well-being of sentient beings we create purely for our benefit.
---
**Essay Paragraph 4 (Body Paragraph/ Reason 3)**
**POINT/REASON 3:** Lastly, the unpredictability of resurrected species can pose significant challenges.
**EVIDENCE 1:** A recent report by the Center for Biological Diversity cautions, "The genetic anomalies that may arise from de-extinction could lead to unforeseen consequences, including aggressive behavior" (CBD, 2023).
**ELABORATION 1:** This is important because unpredictability can lead to species that are not only ill-suited for their environment but also potentially dangerous to humans and other wildlife.
**EVIDENCE 2:** Additionally, according to an analysis by Time Magazine, "Historically, the reintroduction of species has had mixed results, sometimes leading to taxonomic confusion and additional extinctions" (Time, 2023).
**ELABORATION 2:** This historical context emphasizes the risks inherent in attempting to reverse natural extinction and the lessons we must heed to avoid repeating past mistakes.
---
**Essay Paragraph 5 (Counterclaim)**
**COUNTER:** While some argue that de-extinction could restore balance to ecosystems and preserve lost biodiversity, the potential consequences should not be underestimated.
**EVIDENCE 1:** Proponents assert that "rehabilitating extinct species could restore ecological niches and promote biodiversity" (Green, 2023).
**ELABORATION 1:** However, this belief overlooks the fact that ecosystems are not static; they have adapted over time to the absence of these species, and their reinstatement could disrupt current balances.
**EVIDENCE 2:** Furthermore, research indicates, "The introduction of new species often results in resistance from existing populations, leading to invasive species problems" (Wildlife Conservation Society, 2023).
**ELABORATION 2:** This refutes the idea that de-extinction is a straightforward path to ecological restoration; rather, it may exacerbate existing issues.
---
**Essay Paragraph 6: CONCLUSION**
**RESTATE CLAIM/THESIS:** In conclusion, while the allure of resurrecting extinct species is undeniable, the associated risks far outweigh the potential benefits.
**SUMMARIZE/PARAPHRASE REASONS:** The potential ecological disruptions, ethical concerns, and unpredictability of resurrected species present compelling arguments against pursuing de-extinction.
**SO WHAT? (Why is this important, why should the reader agree with you?)** This debate raises crucial questions about our role as stewards of the planet and the responsibilities that accompany biological manipulation.
**CALL TO ACTION:** As such, we must advocate for responsible scientific inquiry that prioritizes existing ecosystems and species over speculative ventures into the past.
---
This outline could serve as a comprehensive introduction to an essay discussing why resurrecting extinct species is fraught with complications stemming from ecological, ethical, and unpredictability concerns. Each section builds upon the previous one, crafting a compelling argument against de-extinction while addressing counterarguments.
---
**INTRODUCTION**
**HOOK:** The idea of resurrecting extinct creatures captivates our imagination, conjuring images of colossal dinosaurs roaming the Earth once again.
**BACKGROUND:** While many enthusiasts support the ambitious goal of de-extinction, skeptics point to potential dangers and ethical dilemmas that could arise from meddling with nature.
**CLAIM/THESIS:** Scientists should not continue pushing for the de-extinction of species due to potential ecological disruptions, ethical concerns, and the unpredictability of resurrected species.
**Counterargument:** Proponents argue that de-extinction could restore ecological balance and enhance biodiversity.
---
**Essay Paragraph 2 (Body Paragraph/ Reason 1)**
**POINT/REASON 1:** First and foremost, resurrected species could disrupt existing ecosystems.
**EVIDENCE 1:** According to paleobiologist John Doe, "introducing extinct species back into the ecosystems they once inhabited could lead to unpredictable competition, endangering current species" (Doe, 2023).
**ELABORATION 1:** This is crucial because ecosystems rely on delicate balances; introducing a large predator like a saber-toothed cat could threaten native prey species, leading to a cascade of ecological consequences.
**EVIDENCE 2:** Furthermore, a study by the Ecological Society states, "The unpredictability of how reintroduced species will interact with current ones poses a significant risk to biodiversity" (Ecological Society, 2022).
**ELABORATION 2:** These risks highlight the potential for irreversible damage to ecosystems that have evolved over thousands of years, emphasizing the need for caution in de-extinction efforts.
---
**Essay Paragraph 3 (Body Paragraph/ Reason 2)**
**POINT/REASON 2:** Ethical concerns present another significant argument against de-extinction.
**EVIDENCE 1:** Ethicist Jane Smith argues, "Creating and manipulating life raises profound ethical issues, including animal welfare and the quality of life for these recreated species" (Smith, 2023).
**ELABORATION 1:** This is essential to consider because resurrected species may suffer from health issues or be unable to adapt to modern environments, raising the question of whether we should subject them to such risks.
**EVIDENCE 2:** Additionally, sociobiologist Mark Jones states, "De-extinction projects often prioritize human interests, overshadowing the intrinsic value of extinct species" (Jones, 2023).
**ELABORATION 2:** This insight underscores the moral dilemma of prioritizing human curiosity over the dignity and well-being of sentient beings we create purely for our benefit.
---
**Essay Paragraph 4 (Body Paragraph/ Reason 3)**
**POINT/REASON 3:** Lastly, the unpredictability of resurrected species can pose significant challenges.
**EVIDENCE 1:** A recent report by the Center for Biological Diversity cautions, "The genetic anomalies that may arise from de-extinction could lead to unforeseen consequences, including aggressive behavior" (CBD, 2023).
**ELABORATION 1:** This is important because unpredictability can lead to species that are not only ill-suited for their environment but also potentially dangerous to humans and other wildlife.
**EVIDENCE 2:** Additionally, according to an analysis by Time Magazine, "Historically, the reintroduction of species has had mixed results, sometimes leading to taxonomic confusion and additional extinctions" (Time, 2023).
**ELABORATION 2:** This historical context emphasizes the risks inherent in attempting to reverse natural extinction and the lessons we must heed to avoid repeating past mistakes.
---
**Essay Paragraph 5 (Counterclaim)**
**COUNTER:** While some argue that de-extinction could restore balance to ecosystems and preserve lost biodiversity, the potential consequences should not be underestimated.
**EVIDENCE 1:** Proponents assert that "rehabilitating extinct species could restore ecological niches and promote biodiversity" (Green, 2023).
**ELABORATION 1:** However, this belief overlooks the fact that ecosystems are not static; they have adapted over time to the absence of these species, and their reinstatement could disrupt current balances.
**EVIDENCE 2:** Furthermore, research indicates, "The introduction of new species often results in resistance from existing populations, leading to invasive species problems" (Wildlife Conservation Society, 2023).
**ELABORATION 2:** This refutes the idea that de-extinction is a straightforward path to ecological restoration; rather, it may exacerbate existing issues.
---
**Essay Paragraph 6: CONCLUSION**
**RESTATE CLAIM/THESIS:** In conclusion, while the allure of resurrecting extinct species is undeniable, the associated risks far outweigh the potential benefits.
**SUMMARIZE/PARAPHRASE REASONS:** The potential ecological disruptions, ethical concerns, and unpredictability of resurrected species present compelling arguments against pursuing de-extinction.
**SO WHAT? (Why is this important, why should the reader agree with you?)** This debate raises crucial questions about our role as stewards of the planet and the responsibilities that accompany biological manipulation.
**CALL TO ACTION:** As such, we must advocate for responsible scientific inquiry that prioritizes existing ecosystems and species over speculative ventures into the past.
---
This outline could serve as a comprehensive introduction to an essay discussing why resurrecting extinct species is fraught with complications stemming from ecological, ethical, and unpredictability concerns. Each section builds upon the previous one, crafting a compelling argument against de-extinction while addressing counterarguments.