To determine the correct answer to the question, we need to compare the characteristics and tones of the two texts being referenced (Passage 1 and Passage 2). The passage provided is Patrick Henry's speech, where his confidence and resolution are clear as he advocates for liberty against oppression.
-
The author of the first text references his personal experiences, while the author of the second text does not. - This may or may not be true, depending on what Passage 2 specifically discusses.
-
The author of the second text is confident she knows that Congress should pass the equal rights amendment. - This suggests a strong certainty from the author of the second text, but without knowing the content of Passage 2, we cannot evaluate this statement's accuracy.
-
The author of the first text is confident he knows what should be done, while the author of the second text is not. - Patrick Henry's confidence is apparent in his speech, but we need context about Passage 2 to assess how the author’s confidence compares.
-
The author of the second text references her personal experiences, while the author of the first text does not. - This would require knowledge about both passages, particularly if Passage 2 includes personal anecdotes.
Since we only have the text of Patrick Henry’s speech and not Passage 2, we cannot definitively determine the differences. However, based on the fact that Henry's tone is assertive and confident, while the second passage may present a different tone or perspective regarding confidence or personal experience, the third option seems plausible if Passage 2 suggests uncertainty.
Therefore, without the content of Passage 2, the best inference based on typical contrasts would be:
The author of the first text is confident he knows what should be done, while the author of the second text is not.
However, please keep in mind that this response relies on assumptions about the second passage since its content is not provided.