To determine the similarity of the triangles, we need to analyze the angles given for both triangles:
For triangle RST:
- \( m∠R = 29° \)
- \( m∠T = 71° \)
To find \( m∠S \):
- The sum of angles in a triangle is 180°.
- Therefore, \( m∠S = 180° - m∠R - m∠T = 180° - 29° - 71° = 80° \).
So, the angles of triangle RST are:
- \( m∠R = 29° \)
- \( m∠S = 80° \)
- \( m∠T = 71° \)
For triangle CDE:
- \( m∠D = 71° \)
- \( m∠C = 80° \)
To find \( m∠E \):
- The sum of angles in a triangle is 180°.
- Therefore, \( m∠E = 180° - m∠C - m∠D = 180° - 80° - 71° = 29° \).
So, the angles of triangle CDE are:
- \( m∠C = 80° \)
- \( m∠D = 71° \)
- \( m∠E = 29° \)
Now we can compare the angles of the two triangles:
- Triangle RST has angles: \( 29° \), \( 80° \), \( 71° \)
- Triangle CDE has angles: \( 29° \), \( 80° \), \( 71° \)
Since both triangles have the same angles, we conclude that:
\[ \triangle RST \sim \triangle CDE \]
Thus, the true similarity statement is:
\[ \triangle RST \sim \triangle CED \] (however, please note that there seems to be a typo because the order matters: it should be \(\triangle RST \sim \triangle CDE\)).
The correct response given the provided options is:
\(\triangle RST \sim \triangle ECD\).