In 3-5 sentences Make an inference Based on the 2 texts. Include an explanation About how the 2 articles work together to support your inference. Use the R.A.C.E. Writing strategy.

Question

Text 1: Online spaces that allow people in local communities to Gift unneeded Items are growing in popularity-But how do they impact our communities? Supporters in these groups explain that the lack of a middleman In this type of giving helps cut down on Monetary and time costs For everyone. With just a few clicks and a handoff, Community members can find what they need or Get rid of what they don't need-all for free. Critics of these systems say that this type of Convenience comes with risks. One risk is personal safety, As participants might share their home addresses With strangers to exchange items. Additionally, the owner of a secondhand store pointed out that the rise of these groups has hurt their business and could eventually constrain their ability to serve community members that are not comfortable or knowledgeable about online groups. Regardless of the mixed impact, these groups have arrived and continue to grow in use and popularity nationwide.
Text 2 : Online "Spend nothing" exchange groups are a worthy addition to the community effort to cut waste, and improve quality of life. Data from a recent study in the area shows a significant decrease in the number of emergency financial assistance requests to local charities since the groups were created. Although, critics have concerns about the safety of participants, the harm they feel is only hypothetical; there have yet to be any problematic incidents linked to the groups. Most groups even have rules designed to protect their members. Others have suggested that these groups will harm local secondhand stores, but many of the participants are guided to such stores by group members when they post searching for items no one has on hand to gift. One might even argue that these groups help secondhand stores by Spreading the word about their locations and the types of things they are likely to sell. Overall, this trend enriches the local community and help get thing that might otherwise be destined for the dump into the hands of people who can give them a new life. I need to know if this follows the R.A.C.E. writing strategy: Inference: The rise of online gift exchange groups positively impacts local communities by reducing waste and improving access to resources, despite some concerns about safety and the impact on secondhand stores.Explanation: Text 1 highlights the convenience and cost-saving benefits of these online groups while acknowledging the risks and potential negative effects on traditional businesses, indicating a mixed reception. Conversely, Text 2 emphasizes the positive outcomes, such as a decrease in financial assistance requests and the potential for these groups to actually support secondhand stores. Together, the articles present a balanced view, suggesting that while challenges exist, the overall contribution of these exchange groups to community well-being and sustainability is significant.

Answer 1

Your inference and explanation effectively follow the R.A.C.E. writing strategy.

Restate the question: The rise of online gift exchange groups positively impacts local communities by reducing waste and improving access to resources, despite some concerns about safety and the impact on secondhand stores.

Answer: This inference draws from both articles, which discuss the implications of these gift exchange groups within communities.

Cite evidence: Text 1 notes the convenience and cost-saving benefits of such platforms but also raises concerns about personal safety and the potential decline of secondhand stores. Text 2 counters these concerns by providing data that suggests a reduction in emergency financial assistance requests and promoting collaboration between exchange groups and secondhand shops.

Explain: Together, the articles illustrate a complex but ultimately positive view of online gift exchange groups, suggesting that while there are valid concerns, their overall effect on community sustainability and resource accessibility outweighs the negatives. This balanced perspective supports the conclusion that these groups enrich local communities by reducing waste and enhancing the sharing economy.