To determine which reality would NOT be accounted for by von Thünen’s model, we need to understand the model itself. von Thünen’s model explains agricultural land use in relation to distance from a central market. It emphasizes the idea that certain types of agriculture will be located nearer to the market based on transportation costs and the perishability of the products.
Now, let's analyze each option:
-
The first cheese factory in the United States was near Rome, New York. - This might relate to dairy farming being located closer to markets due to the perishable nature of dairy products.
-
Oregon has established a Forest Resources Institute. - This pertains to forestry, which may not be a primary factor in von Thünen’s agricultural land-use model, as it focuses more on farming near urban centers rather than forestry.
-
Florida’s government has a Department of Citrus. - This is relevant because citrus farming typically appears closer to markets due to the perishable nature of citrus fruits.
-
Wyoming is a major cattle-ranching area. - Cattle ranching often occurs further from markets due to the larger land requirements and lower perishability of beef products.
-
New Jersey’s nickname is the Garden State. - This reflects the state’s agricultural productivity, which would align with the model that locates intensive agriculture near markets.
Considering this analysis, the reality that would NOT be accounted for by von Thünen’s model is Oregon has established a Forest Resources Institute. Forest resources do not conform to the same principles of agricultural intensity and market proximity that von Thünen's model describes, as forestry practices may depend less on proximity to urban markets than agriculture does.