Historians could analyze the division of Zulu lands as a significant factor in the lasting British victory in the Zulu Wars by emphasizing that dividing the Zulu lands separated their societies and economies. This fragmentation weakened the Zulu's ability to coordinate and unify their resistance against the British forces. With their societal structures disrupted and economies divided, the Zulu had less capacity to mobilize effectively during the wars, making it easier for the British to defeat them. This analysis highlights how colonial strategies aimed at territorial division can lead to long-term impacts on indigenous resistance.
Read this quote from the section: “In 1879 colonial authorities divided Zulu lands into 13 territories.” How could historians analyze this as a reason for lasting British victory in the Zulu Wars?(1 point) Responses Dividing Zulu land led to British victory at the Battle of Kambula. Dividing Zulu land led to British victory at the Battle of Kambula. Dividing the Zulu lands separated their societies and economies. Dividing the Zulu lands separated their societies and economies. Dividing Zulu lands led to a single chief being appointed by the British to rule. Dividing Zulu lands led to a single chief being appointed by the British to rule. Dividing Zulu lands destroyed the productivity of their agriculture.
1 answer