To determine which table shows that \( y = -f(x) \) results in a reflection over the x-axis, we need to look for a table where the values of \( -f(x) \) are the negative of the corresponding values of \( f(x) \).
Let's analyze each provided table:
-
First table:
- \( x: -2, -3, -6 \)
- \( -f(x): 0, -1, -2 \)
- Possible values of \( f(x) \): \( 0, 1, 2 \)
- This shows that \( -f(-2) = 0 \), \( -f(-3) = -1 \), \( -f(-6) = -2 \).
- This does not represent \( y = -f(x) \) because \( -1 \) and \( -2 \) should be \( 1 \) and \( 2 \) respectively.
-
Second table:
- \( x: -2, -3, -6 \)
- \( -f(x): 0, 1, 2 \)
- Possible values of \( f(x) \): \( 0, -1, -2 \)
- This shows that \( -f(-2) = 0 \), \( -f(-3) = 1 \), \( -f(-6) = 2 \).
- This indicates \( f(-3) = -1 \) and \( f(-6) = -2 \) which is not a correct reflection.
-
Third table:
- \( x: 2, 3, 6 \)
- \( -f(x): 0, 1, 2 \)
- Possible values of \( f(x) \): \( 0, -1, -2 \)
- This suggests \( f(2) = 0 \), \( f(3) = -1 \), \( f(6) = -2 \).
- Values seem inverted, specifically, \( 1 \) should actually represent \( f(3) = -1\) indicating no reflection.
-
Fourth table:
- \( x: 2, 3, 6 \)
- \( -f(x): 0, -1, -2 \)
- Possible values of \( f(x) \): \( 0, 1, 2 \)
- This indicates that \( -f(2) = 0\), \( -f(3) = -1 \) (hence \( f(3) = 1 \)), and \( -f(6) = -2 \) (hence \( f(6) = 2\)).
- This accurately represents a reflection: Each value of \( -f(x) \) is the negative of its corresponding \( f(x) \).
Based on the analysis, the fourth table correctly demonstrates that \( y = -f(x) \) results in a reflection over the x-axis.