To determine if the student's response to discussion question #1 was correct, you need to compare the food requirements of the organisms (Gorilla and Sloth) with the simulation data collected in terms of how many of each color bean they were able to gather during the simulation.
-
Gorilla Requirements:
- Black beads: 20
- Pink beads: 9
- White beads: 2
-
Sloth Requirements:
- Black beads: 0
- Pink beads: 4
- White beads: 4
You would need to analyze the data that was collected during the simulation and see if the number of beans collected fulfills the requirements for each organism.
- If the quantities of beans collected meet or exceed the requirements for each organism, the answer to the discussion question would likely be yes.
- If the collected beans do not meet the requirements, you need to assess whether the reasoning behind the student's conclusion was correct.
Based on the data, the appropriate response to the discussion question can be derived:
- If both the answer and justification align with the data collected (e.g., the Gorilla collected enough of each color bean to survive), then the answer is "Yes, the answer and the reason was correct."
- If the answer aligns but the reasoning does not (e.g., the Gorilla did not collect enough beans, but there was faulty reasoning given), respond with "The answer was correct, but the reason was not correct."
- Continue this analysis for both the answer and reasoning based on the simulation results.
Without access to the simulation data collected during the experiment, I cannot definitively determine the correctness of the student's response. You will need to fill in those details in terms of how many beans were collected to make the final assessment about whether to select one of the response options provided.