The writer employs valid reasoning by presenting evidence on the environmental impact of single-use plastics, citing statistics on pollution and its effects on marine life. By linking these facts to public health concerns and economic implications for communities dependent on clean ecosystems, the argument gains depth and relevance. Furthermore, the writer addresses potential counterarguments regarding convenience, reinforcing the point that the long-term benefits of a ban far outweigh short-term inconveniences. This logical structure effectively strengthens the overall argument for banning single-use plastics in Canada.
Use the article to answer the question.
In 3–5 sentences, explain how the writer uses valid reasoning to develop an overall argument.
Canada Wants to ban single use plastics
(4 points)
1 answer
1 answer