Question
rth is the right choice for them, and if so, creating an alternate plan to follow if something goes wrong or their circumstances change. 1. What is the author's argument in this passage? 2. Does the author give a source or sources for the statistics and opinions quoted? If so, what are the sources? 3. Does the author show bias? Explain your answer. B. DIRECTIONS: Read the passage below. Then, answer the questions that follow. (1) A survey from the Nielsen organization indicates that the average teen spends 900 hours in school and 1,200 hours watching television per year. (2) Statistics from the same survey show children choose to spend their time watching television over spending time with families 54% of the time. (3) Time spent watching television is linked to poor health in teens. 1. What is the author's argument in this passage? 2. How could you prove that the second sentence is a fact? 3. Why is the third sentence an opinion? 4. Do you agree with the argument and its supporting evidence? Why or why not?
Answers
GPT-4o mini
Sure! Let's analyze the passage:
### 1. Author's Argument
The author's argument in this passage is that excessive television watching among teens is detrimental to their overall well-being and health. The statistics presented suggest that a significant amount of time is dedicated to television, which displaces time with family and may contribute to poor health.
### 2. Proving the Second Sentence is a Fact
To prove that the second sentence is a fact, one could reference the survey conducted by the Nielsen organization. This would involve retrieving the actual survey data or report to verify the statistic that children choose to spend their time watching television over spending time with families 54% of the time. If this data comes from a reputable source and is objectively measured, it can be considered factual.
### 3. Why the Third Sentence is an Opinion
The statement that "time spent watching television is linked to poor health in teens" is an opinion because it implies a causal relationship that may not be universally accepted without further evidence. While research may exist supporting this view, it is also possible to argue different interpretations of the data. The language used suggests a judgment about television's impact on health rather than presenting an objective fact.
### 4. Agreement with the Argument and Supporting Evidence
Whether one agrees with the author's argument may depend on personal experiences or beliefs regarding television consumption and health. Some may agree, citing statistics about health issues linked with sedentary lifestyle choices, including excessive screen time. Others might disagree, arguing that television can offer educational benefits or family bonding opportunities, depending on the content viewed. Overall, the agreement hinges on one’s interpretation of the evidence and personal values regarding media consumption.
Feel free to ask if you need more clarification or further assistance!
### 1. Author's Argument
The author's argument in this passage is that excessive television watching among teens is detrimental to their overall well-being and health. The statistics presented suggest that a significant amount of time is dedicated to television, which displaces time with family and may contribute to poor health.
### 2. Proving the Second Sentence is a Fact
To prove that the second sentence is a fact, one could reference the survey conducted by the Nielsen organization. This would involve retrieving the actual survey data or report to verify the statistic that children choose to spend their time watching television over spending time with families 54% of the time. If this data comes from a reputable source and is objectively measured, it can be considered factual.
### 3. Why the Third Sentence is an Opinion
The statement that "time spent watching television is linked to poor health in teens" is an opinion because it implies a causal relationship that may not be universally accepted without further evidence. While research may exist supporting this view, it is also possible to argue different interpretations of the data. The language used suggests a judgment about television's impact on health rather than presenting an objective fact.
### 4. Agreement with the Argument and Supporting Evidence
Whether one agrees with the author's argument may depend on personal experiences or beliefs regarding television consumption and health. Some may agree, citing statistics about health issues linked with sedentary lifestyle choices, including excessive screen time. Others might disagree, arguing that television can offer educational benefits or family bonding opportunities, depending on the content viewed. Overall, the agreement hinges on one’s interpretation of the evidence and personal values regarding media consumption.
Feel free to ask if you need more clarification or further assistance!