Question
DIRECTIONS: Read the passage below. Then, answer the questions that follow. A recent study by pediatric researchers shows that too much screen time can cause delays in a child's development. (2) "In small doses, screen time is okay," says one of the researchers, a professor at the University of Calgary in Alberta, Canada. (3) Some aridis from personal experience that high-quality programming can be helpful to a young child's intellectual development. (4) This study shows, though, that higher levels of screen time lead to problems with problem solving, motor skills, and social skills. 1. What is the author's claim in this passage? 2. How could a person prove that sentence 1 and 2 are factual? 3. Does the author use logical thinking to arrive at his or her position? Explain your answer. 4. Does the author's perspective show any noticeable bias? Explain your answer. 4. Does the author make a strong argument? Explain your answer.
Answers
GPT-4o mini
1. **What is the author's claim in this passage?**
The author's claim is that excessive screen time can lead to developmental delays in children, particularly affecting their problem-solving abilities, motor skills, and social skills.
2. **How could a person prove that sentence 1 and 2 are factual?**
A person could prove these sentences factual by conducting empirical research studies that collect data on children's development in relation to their screen time. This could include longitudinal studies, observational studies, or experiments that measure developmental milestones in children with varying levels of screen exposure. Additionally, reviewing existing literature and studies that explore the effects of screen time on child development could support these claims.
3. **Does the author use logical thinking to arrive at his or her position? Explain your answer.**
Yes, the author uses logical thinking to arrive at their position. The passage presents a clear cause-and-effect relationship between increased screen time and developmental delays in children. The researcher’s statements are supported by the study’s results, which provide logical reasoning to back the claim that too much screen time is detrimental to a child's development.
4. **Does the author's perspective show any noticeable bias? Explain your answer.**
The author does not appear to show noticeable bias in their perspective. The information presented relies on a study conducted by researchers, which suggests a focus on objective findings rather than personal opinions. The mention of “high-quality programming” being beneficial otherwise indicates a balanced perspective that acknowledges both the potential benefits and risks associated with screen time.
5. **Does the author make a strong argument? Explain your answer.**
The author makes a strong argument by citing a recent study conducted by pediatric researchers and presenting clear evidence of the negative effects of excessive screen time on child development. The argument is supported by expert opinion, which adds credibility. However, more information, such as specific data or examples from the study, could further strengthen the argument. Overall, the argument is compelling but could be enhanced with additional evidence.
The author's claim is that excessive screen time can lead to developmental delays in children, particularly affecting their problem-solving abilities, motor skills, and social skills.
2. **How could a person prove that sentence 1 and 2 are factual?**
A person could prove these sentences factual by conducting empirical research studies that collect data on children's development in relation to their screen time. This could include longitudinal studies, observational studies, or experiments that measure developmental milestones in children with varying levels of screen exposure. Additionally, reviewing existing literature and studies that explore the effects of screen time on child development could support these claims.
3. **Does the author use logical thinking to arrive at his or her position? Explain your answer.**
Yes, the author uses logical thinking to arrive at their position. The passage presents a clear cause-and-effect relationship between increased screen time and developmental delays in children. The researcher’s statements are supported by the study’s results, which provide logical reasoning to back the claim that too much screen time is detrimental to a child's development.
4. **Does the author's perspective show any noticeable bias? Explain your answer.**
The author does not appear to show noticeable bias in their perspective. The information presented relies on a study conducted by researchers, which suggests a focus on objective findings rather than personal opinions. The mention of “high-quality programming” being beneficial otherwise indicates a balanced perspective that acknowledges both the potential benefits and risks associated with screen time.
5. **Does the author make a strong argument? Explain your answer.**
The author makes a strong argument by citing a recent study conducted by pediatric researchers and presenting clear evidence of the negative effects of excessive screen time on child development. The argument is supported by expert opinion, which adds credibility. However, more information, such as specific data or examples from the study, could further strengthen the argument. Overall, the argument is compelling but could be enhanced with additional evidence.