Question

in the same age Internet access is vital for the majority of students in the workforce you want a job itself does not require an access application process often does and so do most forms of schooling therefore Internet access should be considered necessary utility and should be guaranteed to all households some fear that changes to the Internet provider industry will force layoffs and disrupt company profits while this will almost certainly happen. It is a minor hurdle compared to the enormous benefit of society at large, making the Internet accessible to all will be a boom, free quality and millions of people we cannot afford to wait any longer.
what concession does the author make?
a that making the internet accessible to will be a boon for equality and help millions of people
b the guaranteeing internet access to all will negatively impact the companies that currently provide internet
c that any negative impacts caused by guaranteeing internet access to all are worth it in light of the benefits
d the internet access is vital for most adults and children in our society today

Answer 1

The correct answer is:

**c that any negative impacts caused by guaranteeing internet access to all are worth it in light of the benefits.**

The author acknowledges the potential negative impact on internet providers, such as layoffs and disruptions to company profits, but argues that these are minor compared to the significant societal benefits of making internet access available to all.