The reasoning is partially sound, as it rests on the assumption that higher fines will universally deter speeding; however, it overlooks potential economic disparities among drivers, as doubling fines may disproportionately affect lower-income individuals and could lead to resentment or non-compliance rather than improved safety. Additionally, the reasoning fails to consider other factors that contribute to speeding and traffic safety, suggesting that simply increasing fines may not be a comprehensive solution.
Our town should double its fines for speeding. Studies show that higher fines result in less speeding, so increasing the fees should improve safety. There is no reason not to do this. If people can afford to pay a $50 fine, then surely they should be able to pay a $100 fine as well. How sound is the reasoning given to support the claim “Our town should double its fines for speeding”? Explain your response in 1-2 sentences. (4 points) 0 / 10000 Word Limit Skip to navigation
1 answer