4 of 44 of 4 Items Feature The graph compares the number of bales of cotton (in millions) produced in a year to the number of enslaved workers (in millions) that year. The data are in this chart: Year Millions of bales of cotton Millions of enslaved workers 1800 0.1 0.9 1810 0.2 1.2 1820 0.3 1.5 1830 0.7 2.0 1840 1.3 2.5 1850 2.1 3.0 1860 3.8 4.0 The graph shows the percent share of cotton production that each state held in the years 1826 and 1859. The data are in this chart: State Percent share in 1826 Percent share in 1859 Georgia 22.7% 15.4% South Carolina 21.2% 6.9% Alabama 13.6% 21.7% Tennessee 13.6% 6.5% Louisiana 11.5% 15.4% Mississippi 6% 26.4% North Carolina 3.1% 3.2% Florida 0.6% 1.5% Other 7.7% 3% State Number (in thousands) in 1820 Number (in thousands) in 1860 Alabama 47.5 435.1 Arkansas 0 111.1 Florida 0 61.7 Georgia 149.7 462.2 Louisiana 69 331.7 Mississippi 32.8 436.6 North Carolina 205 331.1 South Carolina 251.8 402.4 Tennessee 80.1 275.7 Texas 0 182.6 Virginia 425.2 490.1 Question Use the charts to answer the question. Based on the data on the charts, what can be inferred about the states that show an increase of enslaved workers and have low cotton shares? (1 point) Responses Those states used slave labor to grow different crops. Those states used slave labor to grow different crops. Those states used additional slave labor in their factories. Those states used additional slave labor in their factories. Those states had only just begun to grow cotton and had to increase their workforce. Those states had only just begun to grow cotton and had to increase their workforce. Those states were new and data was not available prior to their entry into the Union. Those states were new and data was not available prior to their entry into the Union. Skip to navigation

asked by Gabriel Holmes

2 months ago

16 views

0

0

1 answer

Based on the data from the charts, the most appropriate inference regarding the states that show an increase in enslaved workers while having low cotton shares is:

Those states used slave labor to grow different crops.

This conclusion is drawn from the observation that these states, despite increasing their enslaved workforce, were not heavily involved in cotton production, suggesting that they may have been cultivating other types of crops that also relied on slave labor.

answered by GPT-4o mini

0

0

Question

4 of 44 of 4 Items Feature The graph compares the number of bales of cotton (in millions) produced in a year to the number of enslaved workers (in millions) that year. The data are in this chart: Year Millions of bales of cotton Millions of enslaved workers 1800 0.1 0.9 1810 0.2 1.2 1820 0.3 1.5 1830 0.7 2.0 1840 1.3 2.5 1850 2.1 3.0 1860 3.8 4.0 The graph shows the percent share of cotton production that each state held in the years 1826 and 1859. The data are in this chart: State Percent share in 1826 Percent share in 1859 Georgia 22.7% 15.4% South Carolina 21.2% 6.9% Alabama 13.6% 21.7% Tennessee 13.6% 6.5% Louisiana 11.5% 15.4% Mississippi 6% 26.4% North Carolina 3.1% 3.2% Florida 0.6% 1.5% Other 7.7% 3% State Number (in thousands) in 1820 Number (in thousands) in 1860 Alabama 47.5 435.1 Arkansas 0 111.1 Florida 0 61.7 Georgia 149.7 462.2 Louisiana 69 331.7 Mississippi 32.8 436.6 North Carolina 205 331.1 South Carolina 251.8 402.4 Tennessee 80.1 275.7 Texas 0 182.6 Virginia 425.2 490.1 Question Use the charts to answer the question. Based on the data on the charts, what can be inferred about the states that show an increase of enslaved workers and have low cotton shares? (1 point) Responses Those states used slave labor to grow different crops. Those states used slave labor to grow different crops. Those states used additional slave labor in their factories. Those states used additional slave labor in their factories. Those states had only just begun to grow cotton and had to increase their workforce. Those states had only just begun to grow cotton and had to increase their workforce. Those states were new and data was not available prior to their entry into the Union. Those states were new and data was not available prior to their entry into the Union. Skip to navigation

1 answer

Based on the data from the charts, the most appropriate inference regarding the states that show an increase in enslaved workers while having low cotton shares is:

Those states used slave labor to grow different crops.

This conclusion is drawn from the observation that these states, despite increasing their enslaved workforce, were not heavily involved in cotton production, suggesting that they may have been cultivating other types of crops that also relied on slave labor.

GPT-4o mini · Answer

Based on the data from the charts, the most appropriate inference regarding the states that show an increase in enslaved workers while having low cotton shares is:

Those states used slave labor to grow different crops.

This conclusion is drawn from the observation that these states, despite increasing their enslaved workforce, were not heavily involved in cotton production, suggesting that they may have been cultivating other types of crops that also relied on slave labor.