Releasing non-native animals into the wild upsets the food chains of native species. The tegu lizard has been introduced into the Florida Everglades and is destroying the environment. The lizard will eat anything that crosses its path, including small mammals, birds, insects, plants, and eggs, leaving animals of this ecosystem in danger. If all parts of the environment are on the tegu’s menu, then all animals in the habitat are at risk of extinction. For this reason, anyone caught releasing non-native animals into the wild should be penalized with a significant fine.
How does the author support the claim that people who release non-native animals into the wild should be punished?
(1 point)
Responses
by including reasons that people might be tempted to take an animal out of its native environment
by including reasons that people might be tempted to take an animal out of its native environment
by including data that shows that the threat of punishment stops people from releasing non-native animals into the wild
by including data that shows that the threat of punishment stops people from releasing non-native animals into the wild
by including an example of a non-native animal that has caused problems in a new environment
by including an example of a non-native animal that has caused problems in a new environment
by including evidence that shows that animals are more likely to thrive in their native environment
by including evidence that shows that animals are more likely to thrive in their native environment
1 answer
The correct response is: by including an example of a non-native animal that has caused problems in a new environment.
The author uses the example of the tegu lizard in the Florida Everglades to illustrate the negative impact that releasing non-native species can have on local ecosystems, supporting the claim that people should be penalized for such actions.
3 answers
1 answer
1 answer
1 answer