Here’s how the arguments would be categorized:
Sound
(No arguments meet the criteria for being sound.)
Valid but unsound
- John Adams, John Quincy Adams' father, was a Federalist. (This statement is valid as it correctly identifies John Adams as a Federalist; however, an argument based on this may not necessarily be sound if the conclusion drawn from it is false or lacks supporting premises.)
Invalid
- The nineteenth amendment gave women in the United States the right to vote. (This is a factual statement and does not function as an argument with premises leading to a conclusion.)
- A world war is fought by multiple nations in multiple countries. (This is a definition rather than an argument with premises and a conclusion.)
Feel free to adjust if more context is provided regarding what constitutes an argument in this context!