To categorize the arguments, we need to understand what each term represents:
- Sound: An argument that is both valid (the conclusion logically follows from the premises) and has true premises.
- Valid but unsound: An argument that is valid (the conclusion logically follows from the premises), but at least one of the premises is false.
- Invalid: An argument where the conclusion does not logically follow from the premises, regardless of whether the premises are true or false.
Based on these definitions, here’s how you might categorize the provided arguments:
- Sound: (If there are any known premises that are true and lead to a valid conclusion)
- Valid but unsound: (Any argument that is logically valid but has false premises)
- Invalid: (Arguments that do not logically connect)
Since the actual content of "John Adams," "The nineteenth amendment," and "a world war is fought by multiple nations..." is not provided, I'm unable to definitively categorize those arguments.
If you provide more specifics or context for each argument, I could help you classify them correctly.