To determine the correct table for \( g(x) = -f(-x) \), we need to first analyze the original function \( f(x) = 2(x + 22) \) and use some points from that function to find the corresponding points for \( g(x) \).
Step 1: Find points for \( f(x) \)
Using the given function, let's find some sample inputs and their corresponding outputs.
For example:
-
When \( x = -1 \): \[ f(-1) = 2(-1 + 22) = 2 \times 21 = 42 \]
-
When \( x = 0 \): \[ f(0) = 2(0 + 22) = 2 \times 22 = 44 \]
-
When \( x = 1 \): \[ f(1) = 2(1 + 22) = 2 \times 23 = 46 \]
Now we have the following points for \( f(x) \):
- \( (-1, 42) \)
- \( (0, 44) \)
- \( (1, 46) \)
Step 2: Determine \( g(x) = -f(-x) \)
Now let's calculate \( g(x) \) for the same x-values:
-
For \( x = -1 \): \[ g(-1) = -f(1) = -46 \]
-
For \( x = 0 \): \[ g(0) = -f(0) = -44 \]
-
For \( x = 1 \): \[ g(1) = -f(-1) = -42 \]
This gives us the transformed points:
- \( (-1, -46) \)
- \( (0, -44) \)
- \( (1, -42) \)
However, it seems there might be some discrepancies on using the points based on a direct function since the function to analyze should reflect an existing graph.
Final Table Selection
Looking closely at the provided tables, we need purely to identify which corresponds to the correct transformation.
By checking each:
- The specific option that contains negative values corresponding to the reflection over the origin would be the one with pairs like \( (1, -2) \), \( (2, 0) \), \( (3, -2) \).
Thus, the correct response is:
x | g(x) --- | --- 1 | -2 2 | 0 3 | -2
This clearly shows a reflection across the origin aligned with negative outputs.