Asked by sda
table 1:
x: -2,-1, 0, 1, 2
y: 2, 1, 0, -2, -1
table 2:
x: -2,-1, 0, 1, 2
y: 0, 2, 1, -2, -1
table 3:
x: -2,-1, 0, 1, 2
y: 1, 2, -2, 0, -1
which tables represent relations that are inverses
x: -2,-1, 0, 1, 2
y: 2, 1, 0, -2, -1
table 2:
x: -2,-1, 0, 1, 2
y: 0, 2, 1, -2, -1
table 3:
x: -2,-1, 0, 1, 2
y: 1, 2, -2, 0, -1
which tables represent relations that are inverses
Answers
There are no human answers yet.
Answered by
GPT-4o mini
To determine if two relations are inverses of each other, we need to confirm whether each pair of points \((x_1, y_1)\) from one table corresponds to the pair \((y_1, x_1)\) from the other table. This means if \((x, y)\) exists in one table, then \((y, x)\) should exist in the second table.
Let's analyze the given tables:
1. **Table 1:**
- Points: \((-2, 2), (-1, 1), (0, 0), (1, -2), (2, -1)\)
2. **Table 2:**
- Points: \((-2, 0), (-1, 2), (0, 1), (1, -2), (2, -1)\)
3. **Table 3:**
- Points: \((-2, 1), (-1, 2), (0, -2), (1, 0), (2, -1)\)
Now, let's check pairs between each table:
- **Table 1 and Table 2:**
- Table 1 has point \((-2, 2)\). Table 2 does not have point \((2, -2)\).
- Conclusion: Not inverses.
- **Table 1 and Table 3:**
- Table 1 has point \((-2, 2)\). Table 3 does not have point \((2, -2)\).
- Conclusion: Not inverses.
- **Table 2 and Table 3:**
- Table 2 has point \((-2, 0)\). Table 3 does not have point \((0, -2)\).
- Conclusion: Not inverses.
Since no pair of tables satisfies the conditions for being inverses of each other, **none of the tables represent relations that are inverses.**
Let's analyze the given tables:
1. **Table 1:**
- Points: \((-2, 2), (-1, 1), (0, 0), (1, -2), (2, -1)\)
2. **Table 2:**
- Points: \((-2, 0), (-1, 2), (0, 1), (1, -2), (2, -1)\)
3. **Table 3:**
- Points: \((-2, 1), (-1, 2), (0, -2), (1, 0), (2, -1)\)
Now, let's check pairs between each table:
- **Table 1 and Table 2:**
- Table 1 has point \((-2, 2)\). Table 2 does not have point \((2, -2)\).
- Conclusion: Not inverses.
- **Table 1 and Table 3:**
- Table 1 has point \((-2, 2)\). Table 3 does not have point \((2, -2)\).
- Conclusion: Not inverses.
- **Table 2 and Table 3:**
- Table 2 has point \((-2, 0)\). Table 3 does not have point \((0, -2)\).
- Conclusion: Not inverses.
Since no pair of tables satisfies the conditions for being inverses of each other, **none of the tables represent relations that are inverses.**
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.