Question

Which situation could the inequality 45w+220≥650
represent?(1 point)
Responses

Pedro needs at least $650 to buy a laptop. He has already saved $45. If Pedro saves $220 each week, in how many weeks, w, will he have saved enough to buy the laptop?
Pedro needs at least $650 to buy a laptop. He has already saved $45. If Pedro saves $220 each week, in how many weeks, w , will he have saved enough to buy the laptop?

Pedro needs at least $650 to buy a laptop. He has already saved $220. If Pedro saves $45 each week, in how many weeks, w, will he have saved enough to buy the laptop?
Pedro needs at least $650 to buy a laptop. He has already saved $220. If Pedro saves $45 each week, in how many weeks, w , will he have saved enough to buy the laptop?

Pedro needs more than $650 to buy a laptop. He has already saved $220. If Pedro saves $45 each week, in how many weeks, w, will he have saved enough to buy the laptop?
Pedro needs more than $650 to buy a laptop. He has already saved $220. If Pedro saves $45 each week, in how many weeks, w , will he have saved enough to buy the laptop?

Pedro needs at least $650 to buy a laptop. He also needs $220 to buy a new desk. If Pedro saves $45 each week, in how many weeks, w, will he have saved enough money?

Answers

GPT-4o mini
The inequality \( 45w + 220 \geq 650 \) represents the situation where Pedro is saving money over time to reach a financial goal.

Let's analyze the possible scenarios based on the inequality:

- **\(45w\)** can represent the amount of money Pedro saves each week, where he saves $45 for \(w\) weeks.
- **\(220\)** is the amount of money he has already saved.
- **\(\geq 650\)** indicates that he needs at least $650 to buy the laptop.

From this, the inequality suggests that after saving $45 each week for \(w\) weeks, along with the $220 already saved, he aims to have at least $650.

Therefore, the first option matches perfectly:

**Pedro needs at least $650 to buy a laptop. He has already saved $45. If Pedro saves $220 each week, in how many weeks, w, will he have saved enough to buy the laptop?**

However, please note there is a mistake in the last part of this response as the initial saving should be $220 and the weekly saving should be $45, leading to:

**Pedro needs at least $650 to buy a laptop. He has already saved $220. If Pedro saves $45 each week, in how many weeks, w, will he have saved enough to buy the laptop?**

Would be the proper interpretation based on the inequality provided.