Question

Key Terms
Interpret- to understand and explain information or an idea.
Author’s purpose- the reason an author writes a text. Must have a verb. “To explain, to inform, to persuade, to educate, to entertain” PIE
Point of view/ Perspective- opinion
Conflicting point of view- an opposing opinion about a topic
Argument- a claim, position, or idea supported by reasons and backed up with evidence.
Claim- statement of opinion
Reasons- statements in support of a claim
Evidence- something that provides proof for a claim

Refute- assert that an idea is weak or incorrect
Conclusion- judgments based on reasoning


Directions: Within Unit 3 , lessons 1-8 have prepared you to complete a piece of analytical writing. Recall what you have learned in this portfolio to write an analysis of the texts, “Genetically Modified Salmon Can Feed the World” by Yonathan Zohar and “Say No to Genetically Engineered Salmon” by Rick Moonen. Use the prompts to guide your response.

Audio Recording of “Genetically Modified Salmon Can Feed the World”.
Audio Recording of “Say No to Genetically Engineered Salmon”

Your portfolio must include the following:
-A minimum one paragraph response to each of the questions listed below. No introduction or conclusion are needed. You will turn in at least three paragraphs.
-This assignment is NOT a compare and contrast between the two articles. This assignment is NOT asking for your opinion, or for you to pick which article is more persuasive.
-In-text citations when referencing the two articles. Ex. (Zohar) or (Moonen) According to Moonen, “dfdsfjds”. “Dsfsdlfj” (Moonen)

Textbook Directions:Write a paragraph in which you describe the steps that experienced readers can use to analyze conflicting information in texts about the same topic. Explain why it is important for readers to recognize and evaluate conflicting information. Provide specific examples from the two texts.

Make the paragraph simple.

Answer 1

Experienced readers can follow several steps to analyze conflicting information in texts about the same topic. First, they should identify the main claims made by each author. For example, Zohar argues that genetically modified salmon can help address global food shortages (Zohar), while Moonen claims that these modifications pose health and environmental risks (Moonen). Next, readers should look for the reasons and evidence each author provides to support their claims. Zohar presents data on potential benefits, like increased food production, while Moonen cites studies on the ecological impact of genetically engineered fish. It is also important for readers to consider the authors' purposes and perspectives. Recognizing that Zohar aims to inform and persuade readers about the benefits of this technology, while Moonen seeks to warn and educate about its dangers, helps readers understand the underlying motivations behind each argument. Finally, readers should evaluate the credibility of the evidence presented and check for possible biases. This process is crucial as it enables readers to form well-informed opinions rather than taking claims at face value. By critically analyzing differing viewpoints, such as those presented by Zohar and Moonen, readers can better understand the complexities of the issue.