To determine the relevance of each piece of evidence to the claim in the passage regarding the "useless" or incidental usefulness of wildlife species from a human perspective, we can analyze each option:
-
A description of a multicolored feather on a peacock - Yes. This relates to the fascinating aspects of wildlife that capture interest beyond their practical uses, aligning with the passage's focus on interesting traits in animals.
-
A description of a cozy sweater made from sheep wool - No. This example emphasizes a practical human use of sheep rather than showcasing the interest or uniqueness of the animal itself.
-
A description of a gleaming pearl inside an oyster shell - No. Like the sweater, this highlights a useful product derived from wildlife rather than the intriguing nature of the oyster itself, which is what the passage discusses.
-
A description of a feeder being visited by a hummingbird - Yes. This can illustrate an interesting behavior of wildlife that captivates human attention, contributing to the discussion about fascinating aspects of animals.
So the answers are:
- A description of a multicolored feather on a peacock: Yes
- A description of a cozy sweater made from sheep wool: No
- A description of a gleaming pearl inside an oyster shell: No
- A description of a feeder being visited by a hummingbird: Yes