An argument in favor of summer school could interpret the fact as follows: Summer school has not had a negative impact on student achievement. This interpretation focuses on the lack of evidence that summer school is detrimental, suggesting that it may still offer other benefits not measured by direct student achievement metrics.
Read the following fact presented to argue against summer school.
Summer school has not affected student achievement.
How could someone arguing for summer school interpret the fact above?
(1 point)
Responses
Summer school shows no benefit to student achievement.
Summer school shows no benefit to student achievement.
Summer school has not had a negative impact on student achievement.
1 answer