Graphic Organizer for Constructive Criticism
Story Chosen: [Insert a title if available or write "Untitled" if not]
Things I liked about this story are: I really enjoyed the atmosphere you created in the beginning; the description of the cool air and the sound of the humming immediately set an intriguing and mysterious tone. Jorge's curiosity and the introduction of the guardian Lyris added depth to the narrative. The connection to Jorge's grandfather was a clever plot twist that emotionally engaged me as a reader.
Some suggestions for improvement are: Maybe you could provide more background information about the book. What kind of knowledge does it hold? This would help the reader understand its significance better. I have a suggestion to expand on Jorge's feelings during his encounter with Lyris. Describing his thoughts or emotions could enhance the reader's connection to the character. A possible change could be to add more dialogue between Jorge and Lyris to make their interaction feel richer. I think it would be better if you elaborated on the implications of knowing about the passageway, perhaps by hinting at future adventures or challenges Jorge might face.
After reading the story, some questions I still have are:
- What specific knowledge is Lyris willing to share with Jorge?
- How did the book come to be in Jorge's possession?
- Will there be other challenges that Jorge faces now that he knows about the passageway?
Overall, the parts of this story that are effective or engaging are: The mysterious imagery and the characterization of Lyris as a guardian are very effective in keeping the readers engaged. The unique blend of fantasy elements with a personal connection to Jorge's family history was captivating.
Reflection:
I complimented the author on the things they did well. I was specific in my compliments. I used a positive tone throughout my evaluation & ended on a positive note. I focused on the work, not the person. I provided an objective opinion. I avoided using “You” statements. (Ex.- “You didn’t…” or “You shouldn’t…”) I was specific in my recommendations for improvement. I gave examples of how the story might be improved. I asked questions about parts of the story that need clarification or more information.