The reasoning supporting the claim that the town should double its fines for speeding is flawed. While studies may suggest that higher fines can deter speeding, the assumption that those who can afford a $50 fine can easily pay $100 ignores potential economic disparities. A doubling of fines could disproportionately impact low-income individuals who may struggle to pay increased amounts, potentially leading to financial distress or greater societal inequities. Additionally, the argument does not consider other factors that may contribute to speeding, such as enforcement, roadway conditions, or driver education, which could also play a significant role in promoting safety. Therefore, the decision to double fines should be approached with a more nuanced understanding of its broader implications.
Our town should double its fines for speeding. Studies show that higher fines result in less speeding, so increasing the fees should improve safety. There is no reason not to do this. If people can afford to pay a $50 fine, then surely they should be able to pay a $100 fine as well.
How sound is the reasoning given to support the claim “Our town should double its fines for speeding”? Explain your response in 3 to 5 sentences
1 answer
1 answer