The Trail of Tears: Why Were the Cherokee Forced to Move?
The forced removal of the Cherokee people, known as the Trail of Tears, can be understood through three primary lenses: politics, social prejudice, and economics. Each of these factors played a crucial role in the decision to relocate the Cherokee and, ultimately, the execution of that removal.
1. Politics
The political landscape of the early 19th century in America was heavily influenced by westward expansion and the ideology of Manifest Destiny—the belief that Americans were destined to expand across the continent. The Indian Removal Act of 1830, signed by President Andrew Jackson, was a direct result of this expansionist sentiment. Jackson and many other politicians viewed Native Americans not merely as sovereign nations, but as obstacles to progress. The federal government, influenced by a mix of populist desires and political aspirations, supported policies that favored white settlement over the rights of indigenous populations.
Despite a Supreme Court ruling in favor of the Cherokee in Worcester v. Georgia (1832), which affirmed their sovereignty, Jackson's refusal to enforce the ruling demonstrated how politics could override legal decisions. The Treaty of New Echota, signed in 1835 by a minority of Cherokee leaders, was seen as a legitimate political resolution by the U.S. government, though it was vehemently opposed by many Cherokee, including Chief John Ross, who wanted to resist relocation.
2. Social Prejudice
Social attitudes of the era regarding Native Americans were rife with prejudice. Many white settlers viewed the Cherokee and other tribes as inferior and unable to adapt to American ways of life, despite evidence of the Cherokee's efforts to assimilate. This viewpoint was supported by stereotypes that depicted Native Americans as savages, which justified their removal in the eyes of many.
The desire for "civilization" often masked deeper ingrained racism; the efforts of the Cherokee to adopt European-American customs—such as farming, literacy, and Christianity—were overlooked by many who still saw them as unworthy of land ownership. In essence, social prejudice facilitated a narrative that painted the forced removal as a necessary and beneficial action for American society, disregarding the rights and desires of the Cherokee people.
3. Economics
Economic motives were perhaps the most compelling driving force behind the Trail of Tears. The discovery of gold on Cherokee land in 1828 intensified interest in the region, leading to an influx of white settlers who desired access to the wealth generated by the land.
As the economy expanded and white settlers sought land for agriculture and other ventures, the pressure on the Cherokee people grew dangerously intense. Legislatives measures, like the lottery for Cherokee land, further marginalized the tribe, stripping them of their assets. The economic argument for removal posited that in order to increase prosperity for white settlers, Native Americans needed to be relocated. This desire for resources fueled both local and national support for the Indian Removal Act.
Conclusion
The forced relocation of the Cherokee people was not the result of a singular cause but rather a confluence of political maneuvers, deep-seated social prejudices, and powerful economic interests. Ultimately, these factors led to one of the greatest tragedies in American history, where the rights and lives of the Cherokee were sacrificed for land and wealth, culminating in the disastrous forced migration known as the Trail of Tears. Understanding these dimensions is crucial for comprehending the events that transpired and their lasting impact on Native American history and relations in the United States.