To model Brayton's savings goal as an inequality, we first need to consider his earnings from tutoring and his birthday gift.
- Let \( x \) be the number of kids Brayton tutors.
- He earns $20 for each kid he tutors, so his total earnings from tutoring can be represented as \( 20x \).
- He received $100 as a birthday gift, which adds to his total savings.
- He wants to save more than $350, so we can write the inequality:
\[ 20x + 100 > 350 \]
Next, we solve the inequality:
- Subtract 100 from both sides:
\[ 20x > 250 \]
- Divide both sides by 20:
\[ x > 12.5 \]
Since \( x \) must represent a whole number of kids, Brayton needs to tutor at least 13 kids.
Now, we analyze the response choices:
- "Brayton needs to tutor at least 13 kids this week to meet his goal." (This is true.)
- "Brayton needs to tutor at least 13 hours to meet his goal." (This is incorrect, as we deal with kids, not hours.)
- "Brayton needs to tutor 12.5 kids to meet his goal." (This is incorrect, as he needs more than 12.5.)
- "Brayton needs to tutor more than 12.5 hours to meet his goal." (This is incorrect, as we deal with kids, not hours.)
The best interpretation of the solution is:
Brayton needs to tutor at least 13 kids this week to meet his goal.