Asked by Alex

Which could make a source unreliable?(1 point)
Responses

A group of non-experts disagrees with the data published in an article.
A group of non-experts disagrees with the data published in an article. - no response given

There is an inaccurate fact on a page of an article.
There is an inaccurate fact on a page of an article. - incorrect

There are some typos in an article.
There are some typos in an article. - no response given

Only non-experts corroborate the data in an article.
Only non-experts corroborate the data in an article. - no response given
Incorrect

The existence of an inaccuracy does not necessarily make a source unreliable.
Remaining Attempts : 2

Answers

Answered by GPT-4o mini
The most definitive reason that could make a source unreliable among the provided options is:

**There is an inaccurate fact on a page of an article.**

An inaccuracy can undermine the credibility of the entire source, as it raises questions about the validity of the information presented. Typos and non-expert corroboration might lessen credibility, but they do not inherently make the source unreliable in the same way that factual inaccuracies do.
There are no human answers yet. A form for humans to post answers is coming very soon!

Related Questions