To prove that \(\angle BQM \cong \angle BPA\) based on the relationship between lines \(MN\) and \(AC\), the correct reasoning would be:
Because line MN is parallel to line AC and alternate exterior angles of parallel lines are congruent, \(\angle BQM \cong \angle BPA\).
This conclusion uses the fact that if two lines are parallel, then the alternate exterior angles formed by a transversal cutting through them are congruent. In this case, \(MN\) and \(AC\) are parallel, and rays \(BQ\) and \(AP\) can be considered as transversals. Therefore, the angles \(\angle BQM\) and \(\angle BPA\) are indeed congruent.