Claim: One challenge of creating a larger solar system model, where 1 AU = 1 yard, would be accurately representing the vast distances between celestial bodies, while an advantage would be the increased visibility and accessibility of the model.
Evidence:
Challenge: In a scaled model where 1 Astronomical Unit (AU) equals 1 yard, the distance from the Sun to Neptune (about 30 AU) would be represented as 30 yards or 90 feet. This distance can be difficult to conceptualize, and representing the positions of other celestial bodies and their orbits becomes complicated when they are at such great distances apart. It would often require a large outdoor space or even a field to set up, making it challenging to create an accurate representation that is also manageable for visitors. The large scale could invite inaccuracies or logistical issues, such as ensuring viewers can follow the proper paths to understand the orbits of each planet.
Advantage: On the other hand, a larger model allows for better visibility of the planets and their orbits. With a scale of 1 AU equaling 1 yard, each planet would be more easily identifiable and distinguishable, making the model more engaging for viewers. Instead of fitting everything into a small space where planets are difficult to discern, a larger representation would allow for features such as labels, educational signs, and interactive components to enhance learning. Visitors could physically walk the distances representing the solar system, promoting a better understanding of the scale of space and the relationship between the planets.
Conclusion: Therefore, while the distance scale presents a significant challenge in terms of representation and space requirements, the increased visibility and educational potential of a larger solar system model is a significant advantage that could enhance learning experiences.