One of the myths at the core of American culture is the idea of the self-made person, the individual who overcomes obstacles and defies hardships to reach their goals and achieve success. The implication of this myth is that the more hardships a person prevails over, the more worthy they are of admiration and the rewards of success.

Question

Do you think this idea is valid?
Does hardship make people stronger and more successful?
Doesn't it also make people suffer?
What about people who face hardships but never reach their goals, or people whose success seems effortless or the result of happenstance?

Answer 1

The myth of the self-made person is deeply ingrained in American culture and reflects a narrative that emphasizes individualism, resilience, and personal agency. On one hand, there are compelling arguments in favor of the idea that overcoming hardships can foster strength, resilience, and the skills necessary for success. Experiences of adversity can indeed teach valuable lessons, build character, and inspire determination. Many successful individuals often cite their struggles as pivotal moments that shaped their paths and taught them perseverance and problem-solving skills.

However, it is essential to recognize that hardship does not universally equate to strength or success. While some people may thrive in the face of adversity, others may suffer significantly and never attain their goals. Hardships can lead to long-lasting psychological effects, physical health issues, and can create barriers that impede one's ability to succeed, such as trauma, economic disadvantage, or lack of support systems. Not everyone has the same resources, opportunities, or support networks to navigate their challenges effectively.

Additionally, success is often the result of a complex interplay of various factors beyond personal effort. Factors such as socio-economic background, access to education, networking opportunities, and even luck can dramatically influence outcomes. People may achieve success with seemingly little struggle, while others may work tirelessly and still face setbacks. This highlights the absurdity of equating hardship with inherent worthiness or deservingness of success.

The notion of the self-made person can also create unrealistic expectations and stigmatize those who are struggling. It can lead to the belief that individuals are solely responsible for their circumstances, potentially undermining the societal responsibilities to address systemic inequalities that contribute to hardship.

In conclusion, while hardship can build resilience in some individuals, it is not a universal formula for success. It is vital to acknowledge the complexity of life experiences, the role of external factors in achieving success, and the varying impacts of hardship on individuals. Cultivating a more nuanced understanding of success that incorporates both personal agency and systemic factors may create a healthier narrative within society.