To help you with the questions, I'll provide general reasoning based on common environmental and economic principles. However, since I don't have access to the specific notes from the meeting, I'll guide you through what types of responses would typically fit in such contexts.
Question 1:
Which possible solution would have the lowest initial cost?
- Renovate an existing mall using recycled materials: This could potentially have a lower cost due to not needing to purchase new land or complete new construction.
- Build a smaller shopping center: This may also be lower cost due to less construction, but still requires new land.
- Refuse to grant a permit for construction or renovation of a mall: This does not incur any costs as it stops further activity, but does not involve building.
- Build the mall on an area already cleared but on the other side of town: This might involve costs related to transportation and new land acquisition.
Based on this reasoning, "Renovate an existing mall using recycled materials" is likely to have the lowest initial cost since it avoids the expenses related to new construction.
Question 2:
For this part, to drag and drop the statements, you would typically fill out the table with the following kinds of responses based on what speakers might discuss:
Speaker’s Possible Solution:
- Renovate an existing mall using recycled materials
- Build a smaller shopping center
- Refuse to grant a permit for construction or renovation of a mall
- Build the mall on an area already cleared but on the other side of town
"Cons" for this Solution (drawbacks):
- Renovate an existing mall using recycled materials: May require significant time for renovation; existing structure might not be suitable for new types of businesses.
- Build a smaller shopping center: Might not provide enough retail space to attract businesses; could decrease potential tax revenue.
- Refuse to grant a permit for construction or renovation of a mall: Local economy might suffer without job creation or new retail opportunities.
- Build the mall on an area already cleared but on the other side of town: New construction costs; could lead to increased traffic problems if located poorly.
"Pros" for this Solution (benefits):
- Renovate an existing mall using recycled materials: Reduces waste and promotes sustainable practices; could preserve existing jobs.
- Build a smaller shopping center: Less environmental impact compared to a large mall; can be designed to fit community needs closely.
- Refuse to grant a permit for construction or renovation of a mall: Protects natural wetlands and biodiversity; maintains the ecosystem.
- Build the mall on an area already cleared but on the other side of town: Minimizes direct destruction of natural wetlands; creates jobs and potential economic growth.
After completing these sections, ensure that the speakers and their respective pros and cons align correctly in your table! If you have specific statements from the meeting notes that need to be placed in the table or if there are any particular pros or cons mentioned that you'd like to clarify, feel free to share!