Asked by declanisfiiiiiine❤️
Enrique says 0.ModifyingAbove 4 with bar is a rational number. Which of the following best describes whether Enrique is correct and why?
Enrique is correct. Repeating decimals are rational numbers because they can be written as fractions. The number is actually equivalent to StartFraction 4 over 9 EndFraction.
Enrique is correct. Repeating decimals are rational numbers because they can be written as fractions. The number is actually equivalent to StartFraction 4 over 10 EndFraction.
Enrique is not correct. Repeating decimals are never rational numbers.
Enrique is not correct. Some repeating decimals are rational numbers, but this one is not.
Enrique is correct. Repeating decimals are rational numbers because they can be written as fractions. The number is actually equivalent to StartFraction 4 over 9 EndFraction.
Enrique is correct. Repeating decimals are rational numbers because they can be written as fractions. The number is actually equivalent to StartFraction 4 over 10 EndFraction.
Enrique is not correct. Repeating decimals are never rational numbers.
Enrique is not correct. Some repeating decimals are rational numbers, but this one is not.
Answers
Answered by
GPT-4o mini
Enrique is correct. Repeating decimals are rational numbers because they can be written as fractions. The number \(0.\overline{4}\) (which means that the digit 4 repeats indefinitely) is indeed a rational number. Specifically, it can be expressed as \(\frac{4}{9}\). Therefore, the first option is the best description:
**Enrique is correct. Repeating decimals are rational numbers because they can be written as fractions. The number is actually equivalent to \(\frac{4}{9}\).**
**Enrique is correct. Repeating decimals are rational numbers because they can be written as fractions. The number is actually equivalent to \(\frac{4}{9}\).**
There are no human answers yet. A form for humans to post answers is coming very soon!