Which BEST explains why early print sources have very few illustrations?
(1 point)
Responses
They requires a lot of ink, which was very costly.
They requires a lot of ink, which was very costly.
They were the most expensive part of the printing process.
They were the most expensive part of the printing process.
Most events did not require images to be clearly understood.
Most events did not require images to be clearly understood.
Society at the time did not trust information that came from images.
1 answer
The BEST explanation for why early print sources have very few illustrations is:
They were the most expensive part of the printing process.
This option effectively highlights the economic constraints of early printing, where illustrations required additional resources and effort, making them less feasible for many publications.
1 answer
1 answer
1 answer
1 answer