explain what you did, include materials, procedures, data in complete sentences (1-2 paragraphs)

materials : [200 ml for each filter] Dirty Water (Soil, Sand, Vinegar, etc)
Cotton Balls (17 cotton balls per filter)
Charcoal (4 smashed charcoal per filter) (1 coffee filter for protection) THIS MAY AFFECT THE DATA
Marbles (25 marbles per filter) (1 coffee filter for protection THIS MAY AFFECT THE DATA
Sand (¼ liter per filter) (1 coffee filter for protection) THIS MAY AFFECT THE DATA
Coffee Filter (11 coffee filters per filter) (2 coffee filters below it for protection)
Half of a water bottle (the top half with the neck)
Scissors
Kettle (to hold the “dirty water”
Measuring Cup
pH strips
Rubber Bands
Paper Tape (to label)
[add how much water it can hold] Container

procedure: Gather materials: Collect the following materials
Cut the water bottle in half, only using the top half (with the neck)
Fill the top half of the water bottle with the material you are using to filter the “dirty water”
Get a container and put it below the top half of the water bottle that is filled with the filter media
After securing the top half filled with the filter media into the container, pour the “dirty water” into the top half of the water bottle filled with the filter media
Wait until all the “dirty water” has been “filtered” through the filter media
After all the water has been “filtered” observe the results then test the pH of the filtered water.
After finding the pH of the substance record it on a sheet of paper
Repeat this process for each filter media 5 times.

data: Filter Media
Dirty Water pH
pH after Filtration [Trial 1]
pH after Filtration [Trial 2]
pH after Filtration [Trial 3]
pH after Filtration [Trial 4]
pH after Filtration [Trial 5]
Avg.
Cotton Balls
6.2
6.4
6.5
6.4
6.5
6.6
6.48
Coffee Filter
6.2
6.5
6.6
6.4
6.6
6.6
6.54
Charcoal
6.2
6.4
6.5
6.4
6.5
6.5
6.46
Sand
6.2
7.0
7.1
7.1
7.0
7.2
7.08
Marble
6.2
6.7
6.7
6.8
6.7
6.8
6.74

1 answer

In this experiment, we aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of different filtration media in improving the pH level of contaminated water. The materials used included 200 ml of dirty water composed of soil, sand, and vinegar, along with cotton balls, smashed charcoal, marbles, and sand, each integrated into custom filtration units made from cut, half water bottles. Each filter was layered with 17 cotton balls, 4 pieces of charcoal, 25 marbles, or a quarter liter of sand, all protected by coffee filters to contain the materials. We prepared a support container under each filter to catch the filtered water, ensuring that we accurately captured the results.

The procedure involved pouring the dirty water into the top half of the water bottle filled with the selected filtration media and allowing it to filter through. After all the water drained, we measured the pH of the filtered water using pH strips and recorded this data meticulously over five trials for each type of filter. For cotton balls, the average pH after filtration was 6.48; for coffee filters, it was 6.54; for charcoal, it was 6.46; for sand, it increased to 7.08; and for marbles, it reached 6.74. Our results indicated varying levels of effectiveness among the different filter media, with sand showing the most significant increase in pH. However, the presence of coffee filters and other materials could potentially impact the results.