Which of the following best suggests the benefits of the Aztec Empire’s decentralized government?(1 point)

Question

Responses

It eliminated the need for a central emperor and expensive religious rituals.
It eliminated the need for a central emperor and expensive religious rituals.

City-states within the empire had to build up armies to protect themselves.
City-states within the empire had to build up armies to protect themselves.

Local leaders retaining power likely made them more content to be part of the empire.
Local leaders retaining power likely made them more content to be part of the empire.

Dissatisfied local leaders could object to decisions by the emperor and cause problems.

Answer 1

The response that best suggests the benefits of the Aztec Empire’s decentralized government is:

Local leaders retaining power likely made them more content to be part of the empire.

This option highlights the positive aspect of decentralization, which is the contentment and loyalty of local leaders and populations due to their ability to maintain some degree of autonomy and governance.

Answer 2

Which of the following is a long-term consequence of Spanish conquests in the Americas?(1 point)
Responses

changes in Catholic Church doctrine to suit the needs of Indigenous peoples
changes in Catholic Church doctrine to suit the needs of Indigenous peoples

encouragement of native plants
encouragement of native plants

implementation of cattle farming in Europe
implementation of cattle farming in Europe

a growing interdependence between the Americans and Europe

Answer 3

The option that best represents a long-term consequence of Spanish conquests in the Americas is:

a growing interdependence between the Americans and Europe.

This interdependence developed as a result of the exchange of goods, cultures, and populations that took place following the conquests, especially through systems like the Columbian Exchange, which significantly impacted economies and societies on both sides of the Atlantic over the long term.

Answer 4

Which statement explains a difference between the perspectives of the Aztec and the Inca on the arrival of the Spanish?(1 point)
Responses

The Aztec ruled through diplomacy and welcomed the visiting Spaniards. The Inca ruled through brutal military tactics and saw the Spaniards as a threat.
The Aztec ruled through diplomacy and welcomed the visiting Spaniards. The Inca ruled through brutal military tactics and saw the Spaniards as a threat.

Montezuma thought the arrival of the Spanish could mean the return of their god Quetzalcoatl; Atahuallpa thought the Spanish would honor the Incan chief.
Montezuma thought the arrival of the Spanish could mean the return of their god Quetzalcoatl; Atahuallpa thought the Spanish would honor the Incan chief.

The Aztec people supported Montezuma in ruling jointly with the Spanish. The Incan people supported Atahuallpa in giving the Spanish riches.
The Aztec people supported Montezuma in ruling jointly with the Spanish. The Incan people sup

Answer 5

The statement that best explains a difference between the perspectives of the Aztec and the Inca on the arrival of the Spanish is:

Montezuma thought the arrival of the Spanish could mean the return of their god Quetzalcoatl; Atahuallpa thought the Spanish would honor the Incan chief.

This reflects the differing outlooks of the leaders of the two civilizations regarding the motives and intentions of the Spanish, as well as their respective cultural beliefs and expectations during the encounters.