Yes, I can help! What do you need assistance with?
bot cann you help or no?!
11 answers
Begin the discussion by responding to the following prompt:
This 1865 account has a certain style and tone that differs from news stories today. What effect do you think such a report had on readers in 1865? Keep in mind that citizens might have read the report several days after the event occurred. How would today’s 24-hour news cycle affect reporting on such a tragic event? How might those changes alter the way citizens today respond to tragedy? Give your opinion and support it with examples.
Post a detailed response to the 1865 Reporting Discussion prompt. Then respond to two classmates' posts. Think about how you can add to the discussion in effective and meaningful ways. Evaluate the effectiveness of the discussion by asking yourself questions about what people have said in their posts. For example, did a classmate’s post cause you to think differently about the topic? Did your classmate provide sufficient evidence to support a point? As they respond to each other, do classmates’ posts add new ideas or conclusions? Think about your own responses in the same way.
This 1865 account has a certain style and tone that differs from news stories today. What effect do you think such a report had on readers in 1865? Keep in mind that citizens might have read the report several days after the event occurred. How would today’s 24-hour news cycle affect reporting on such a tragic event? How might those changes alter the way citizens today respond to tragedy? Give your opinion and support it with examples.
Post a detailed response to the 1865 Reporting Discussion prompt. Then respond to two classmates' posts. Think about how you can add to the discussion in effective and meaningful ways. Evaluate the effectiveness of the discussion by asking yourself questions about what people have said in their posts. For example, did a classmate’s post cause you to think differently about the topic? Did your classmate provide sufficient evidence to support a point? As they respond to each other, do classmates’ posts add new ideas or conclusions? Think about your own responses in the same way.
In considering the 1865 account of a tragic event, such as the aftermath of President Abraham Lincoln's assassination, we observe a distinct style and tone that reflect the societal norms and journalistic approaches of the time. Reports from this period often encompassed a more formal and narrative-driven style, which, combined with the slower dissemination of news, could evoke a deep emotional resonance among readers. The blend of eloquent prose and somber reflection likely amplified the sense of loss and urgency surrounding events like Lincoln's assassination. For many citizens, who may have read the report days later, the account served not only to inform but to forge a communal sorrow—a collective grappling with the impact of such a tragedy on the nation.
In contrast, today’s 24-hour news cycle provides real-time updates and relentless coverage of tragic events, often characterized by fast-paced reporting and a focus on immediate details of breaking news. This immediacy can lead to a desensitization to tragedy, where the abundance of information, including graphic images and sensational headlines, might dilute the emotional impact. For instance, when tragic events occur today, news outlets rush to deliver updates, which can sometimes prioritize speed over depth. This rapid-fire dissemination can create an environment where citizens feel overwhelmed, resulting in a fleeting response, rather than a sustained reflection on the tragedy's implications.
By comparing the two eras, we observe that the way news is consumed influences public perception significantly. In 1865, a report could foster a contemplative national discourse, inviting readers to reflect on themes of loss, resilience, and unity. Conversely, in today's media landscape, the saturation of news cycles often leads to a more fleeting engagement; citizens might move on to the next story before fully processing the gravity of the previous one. For example, a mass shooting might dominate news headlines for a few days, but attention often quickly shifts to another event, leaving little space for meaningful dialogue about gun control or mental health.
In summary, the style and tone of 1865 news accounts likely cultivated a deep sense of shared grief and contemplation among readers, while the contemporary approach can often result in a rapid, surface-level engagement with tragic events. This evolution in reporting shapes how societies respond to tragedy, demonstrating a shift from reflective mourning to immediate, episodic consumption of news. Ultimately, both approaches have their pitfalls and strengths, challenging us to consider how we consume news in our digital age and how that influences our emotional and civic engagement with the world around us.
Feel free to share your thoughts or ask specific questions about how to engage with classmates' posts!
make it one simple short paragraph
The 1865 account of tragic events, such as Lincoln's assassination, often employed a formal and narrative-driven tone, fostering deep emotional resonance and communal sorrow among readers, who consumed the news days after the event. In contrast, today's 24-hour news cycle delivers real-time updates that can lead to desensitization, as the fast-paced reporting prioritizes immediacy over depth, often resulting in fleeting engagement with tragic events. This shift means that while 19th-century readers may have taken time to reflect on loss and its implications for society, modern audiences often move quickly from one story to another, potentially diminishing the emotional impact and critical discourse surrounding tragedies.
think of another example
Another example to illustrate the contrast in reporting styles and their effects on public response can be drawn from the sinking of the RMS Titanic in 1912. The detailed reportage following the tragedy provided extensive narratives that focused on individual stories of survival and loss, fostering a sense of collective mourning and reflection among readers as they processed the event through in-depth articles and human interest pieces over several days. This style not only informed the public but also encouraged discussions about maritime safety and regulations. In contrast, today's coverage of maritime disasters or accidents would likely involve rapid updates and an emphasis on immediate facts and statistics, potentially overshadowing personal narratives and limiting opportunities for deeper reflection. Consequently, while the Titanic's aftermath might have inspired meaningful conversations about safety reforms, modern news cycles could result in a more superficial engagement, where such tragedies quickly fade from public discourse amid a barrage of ongoing breaking news.
what about presidents voting and make it rlly simpleee
A great example of this contrast is the coverage of presidential elections. In the past, like during the election of 1800, news articles often contained detailed accounts of candidates' policies and personal stories, engaging readers in thoughtful discussions about the future of the country over several weeks. This slower pace allowed citizens to reflect deeply on their choices. In contrast, today’s coverage of presidential elections happens in a frantic 24-hour news cycle, focusing on quick sound bites, social media reactions, and constant polling updates. This rapid-fire approach can lead to a shallow understanding of the issues, as voters may struggle to engage deeply with candidates' platforms due to the overwhelming volume of information. As a result, modern voters may not fully grasp the implications of their choices, making informed voting more challenging.
simplee so kids can understand
An example of different reporting styles can be seen in presidential elections. In the past, like during the election in 1800, newspapers would write long articles that included stories about the candidates and their ideas, giving people time to think about who they wanted to vote for. Today, news about elections comes out really fast, with quick updates and social media posts that often focus on polls and dramatic moments. This makes it harder for voters to fully understand the candidates’ plans because there’s so much information to keep up with all at once. So, while people in the past had time to carefully consider their choices, today many might rush their decisions without knowing everything they need to.
1 answer