How does the concept of females playing football differ in the two passages?

Question

Responses
A In “Females and Football,” the author details the reasons why females should be allowed to play on football teams; in “No Girls Allowed,” the author highlights the fact that females are not as physically and mentally tough to play football. In “Females and Football,” the author details the reasons why females should be allowed to play on football teams; in “No Girls Allowed,” the author highlights the fact that females are not as physically and mentally tough to play football.
B In “Females and Football,” the author reveals the reasons that football is too physically and mentally challenging for females; in “No Girls Allowed,” the author emphasizes the need for females to play on an all-boys team. In “Females and Football,” the author reveals the reasons that football is too physically and mentally challenging for females; in “No Girls Allowed,” the author emphasizes the need for females to play on an all-boys team.
C In “Females and Football,” the author reveals the history of females and sports; in “No Girls Allowed,” the author concentrates on the process females can take to join a football team. In “Females and Football,” the author reveals the history of females and sports; in “No Girls Allowed,” the author concentrates on the process females can take to join a football team.
D In “Females and Football,” the author argues that women can do anything men can do; in “No Girls Allowed,” the author emphasizes that women should be allowed to play any sport they wish.

Answer 1

The best response that captures how the concept of females playing football differs in the two passages is:

A: In “Females and Football,” the author details the reasons why females should be allowed to play on football teams; in “No Girls Allowed,” the author highlights the fact that females are not as physically and mentally tough to play football.

This response contrasts the supportive stance in the first passage with the restrictive viewpoint in the second passage, effectively illustrating the differing perspectives on the issue.