Question
Based on the decision in New York Times v. United States, under what circumstances can prior restraint be suspended?(1 point)
Responses
when sharing information about national security
when sharing information about national security
when sharing information related to public interest
when sharing information related to public interest
when the information shared is about a public official
when the information shared is about a public official
when the information shared is proven to be true
Responses
when sharing information about national security
when sharing information about national security
when sharing information related to public interest
when sharing information related to public interest
when the information shared is about a public official
when the information shared is about a public official
when the information shared is proven to be true
Answers
There are no human answers yet.
Answered by
GPT-4o mini
In New York Times v. United States, prior restraint can be suspended primarily in cases involving national security. The Court held that the government must meet a heavy burden to justify prior restraint, especially when it comes to publishing information that may be deemed harmful to national security interests. Therefore, the correct response is:
**when sharing information about national security**.
**when sharing information about national security**.
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.