To determine the pairs of corresponding sides in the parallelograms and the scale factor used, we first need to establish the relationship between the sides of the original parallelogram and the new one created using a scale factor.
-
Select the pairs of corresponding sides:
Since the original and scaled parallelograms are not given with specific measurements in your message, we'll make an assumption based on typical scenarios. Based on the options provided, we can logically deduce which sides are likely corresponding if:
- The larger parallelogram has dimensions (for example) such as 5 inches and 3.5 inches.
- The smaller parallelogram has corresponding sides that are proportional to the larger, for example, 1 inch and 0.7 inch.
Given the options and typical scale relationships, the most likely pairs of corresponding sides would be:
- 3.5 inches corresponds to 5 inches (scaling up)
- 1 inch corresponds to 5 inches (scaling)
- 0.7 inch corresponds to 3.5 inches (scaling down)
Thus, a plausible selection is:
- 3.5 inches corresponds to 5 inches
- 0.7 inch corresponds to 1 inch
-
What scale factor does she use?
Let's consider the effective scale from one side to another:
If 3.5 inches on the original corresponds to 5 inches on the new, then the scale factor can be calculated as follows:
\[ \text{Scale Factor} = \frac{\text{Length of new side}}{\text{Length of original side}} = \frac{5}{3.5} = \frac{10}{7} \approx 1.43 \]
If instead the smaller sides are being analyzed, like 0.7 inch to 1 inch:
\[ \text{Scale Factor} = \frac{1}{0.7} \approx 1.43 \]
Since we don’t see 1.43 as an option, it seems that our estimation doesn't match the given responses. Instead, let's analyze some of the options:
Generally, if the smaller parallelogram sides were indeed, say, 0.7 and 3.5, which correlate, it could imply a scale down to 0.2 essentially if the factor applied onward multiplicatively.
Given the options and to determine which is more feasible, we could settle on 0.2 as a potential reduction approximation given. It is common enough if treating areas proportionally be represented through area focusing rather than just side length (which mirrors typical retention).
Final assessments:
- Pairs of corresponding sides:
- 3.5 inches corresponds to 5 inches
- 0.7 inches corresponds to 1 inch
- Scale factor:
- 0.2 is the reasonable scaling down based on the option lists provided.
1 answer