Argue against the notional Zambian should have introduced tertiary free education and not primary and basic education.

1 answer

Arguing against the notion that Zambia should have prioritized introducing tertiary free education over free primary and basic education can be framed from several perspectives including equity, foundational skills, economic considerations, and societal benefits.

  1. Equity and Access: Free primary and basic education ensures that all children, regardless of their socio-economic background, have access to the fundamental right of education. In many cases, primary education is where disparities in education and opportunity begin. By prioritizing free primary education, the Zambian government works to level the playing field and reduces barriers to education for marginalized groups, ultimately fostering a more equitable society. This foundational access can have long-term societal benefits.

  2. Foundational Skills: Primary and basic education provides essential literacy, numeracy, and critical thinking skills. These foundational skills are crucial for any subsequent learning and personal development. Without a solid grounding in these areas, students may struggle in higher educational environments, rendering the introduction of free tertiary education less effective. If students do not receive quality primary education, they may be ill-prepared for the challenges of tertiary studies, potentially leading to higher dropout rates.

  3. Economic Considerations: Investing in primary and basic education can yield higher returns on investment for a nation’s economy than focusing solely on higher education. A well-educated populace increases productivity, improves workforce participation, and fuels economic growth. Data often show that countries with high rates of literacy and basic education tend to grow faster economically. Therefore, establishing a strong base in primary education can create a more capable workforce that will empower higher education institutions in the future.

  4. Long-Term Development: Prioritizing free primary education contributes to sustainable national development. Educated individuals are better equipped to contribute positively to society, engage in civic duties, and make informed decisions regarding health, finance, and governance. The focus on basic education paves the way for a more informed citizenry, which can support democracy, social cohesion, and national stability.

  5. Preventing Dropout Rates: The introduction of free tertiary education without a strong foundation in primary and basic education may lead to increased dropout rates at the tertiary level. Students who are not adequately prepared in their early education may struggle in higher education environments, leading to frustration, disengagement, and a higher likelihood of dropping out. By securing the success of basic education first, the system can ensure that more students graduate to and succeed in tertiary education.

  6. Safety and Well-being: For many children, basic and primary education provides not just learning but also a safe environment, nutrition, and social interaction. These factors are crucial in the early developmental stages. Focusing on primary education helps to address societal inequalities and supports the health and well-being of children, particularly in vulnerable communities.

In conclusion, while tertiary education is undoubtedly important, establishing free primary and basic education should take precedence. It ensures that all citizens have a solid educational foundation, equity in access to education, and the tools necessary for personal and national development. By building a robust system at the primary level, Zambia can create a stronger pipeline for future education and workforce talent, ultimately benefiting the country as a whole.