Responses
Both monumental structures were built in capital cities as places to worship; the Aztec structure had a landscape design that signified two gods, whereas the Inca structure was rounded and signified one god.
Both monumental structures were built in capital cities as places to worship; the Aztec structure had a landscape design that signified two gods, whereas the Inca structure was rounded and signified one god.
Both monumental structures were built in capital cities as places to worship; the Aztec structure had one temple that signified the sun god, whereas the Inca structure had two temples that signified God.
Both monumental structures were built in capital cities as places to worship; the Aztec structure had one temple that signified the sun god, whereas the Inca structure had two temples that signified God.
Both monumental structures were built in capital cities as places to worship; the Aztec structure was a pyramid that signified two gods, whereas the Inca structure was rounded and signified one god.
Both monumental structures were built in capital cities as places to worship; the Aztec structure was a pyramid that signified two gods, whereas the Inca structure was rounded and signified one god.
Both monumental structures were built in capital cities as places to worship; the Aztec structure had two temples that signified the Tiawanaku gods, whereas the Inca structure had one temple that signified God.
1 answer
The best comparison of the role of monumental architecture in the Aztec and Inca capitals is:
Both monumental structures were built in capital cities as places to worship; the Aztec structure was a pyramid that signified two gods, whereas the Inca structure was rounded and signified one god.
This response accurately reflects the purpose of both architectural forms while highlighting the distinct characteristics associated with each civilization's monumental structures.
