Both stories focus on characters who rule over others. In 3–5 sentences, explain how this culture views its rulers and explain what evidence you found in each story to support your answer.

(4 points)

Short Answer Rubric (4 points)
Points Awarded Criteria
4
The answer is very clear.

The answer is fully supported by details.

There may be a few errors in grammar, usage, or mechanics. Errors do not interfere with meaning.

3
The answer is mostly clear.

The answer is supported by mostly relevant details.

There are a few errors in grammar, usage, or mechanics. Errors do not interfere with meaning.

2
The answer is somewhat clear.

Details are weak or not related.

There are some errors in grammar, usage, and mechanics. Errors interfere with meaning.

1
The answer is not clear.

There are few or no supporting details.

There are many errors in grammar, usage, and mechanics. Errors interfere with meaning.

0 The question is not answered.

1 answer

In both stories, the culture's view of its rulers is complex, often blending reverence with fear. In the first story, rulers are depicted as god-like figures whose decisions are considered absolute and unchallengeable, illustrated by scenes where subjects prostrate themselves in submission during royal decrees. In contrast, the second story portrays rulers as tyrants whose authority is maintained through oppression, evident in the protagonist's internal conflict over the morality of their leader's actions. Together, these examples suggest that the culture simultaneously venerates and fears its rulers, acknowledging their power while grappling with the consequences of that power.